488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32772026)
21. Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Tzavara C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 309(3):939-948. PubMed ID: 37821642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predicting persistent/recurrent disease in the cervix after excisional biopsy.
Ramchandani SM; Houck KL; Hernandez E; Gaughan JP
MedGenMed; 2007 Apr; 9(2):24. PubMed ID: 17955080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.
Kliemann LM; Silva M; Reinheimer M; Rivoire WA; Capp E; Dos Reis R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):342-6. PubMed ID: 22948133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study.
Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia.
Kobak WH; Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 7824230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Endometrial and endocervical curettage findings at the time of cervical conization.
Presley JJ; Hernandez E; Mudafort E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3560085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of endocervical curettage during loop electrosurgical excision procedures in predicting persistent/recurrent preinvasive cervical disease.
Cuello MA; Espinosa ME; Orlandini EJ; Hwang DY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 141(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 29509961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship of human papillomavirus infection with endocervical glandular involvement on cone specimens in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Spinillo A; Dominoni M; Boschi AC; Cesari S; Fiandrino G; Gardella B
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):630-635. PubMed ID: 33041069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.
Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 8942830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Stratified research on related risk factors of CINⅡ
Xiao JJ; Chen ZR; Wang Q; Sui L; Cong Q
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 57(8):608-617. PubMed ID: 36008288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
