These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32772292)

  • 21. Combined Approach for Government E-Tendering Using GA and TOPSIS with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information.
    Wang Y; Xi C; Zhang S; Zhang W; Yu D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130767. PubMed ID: 26147468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Green Supplier Selection Based on Green Practices Evaluated Using Fuzzy Approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a Case Study in a Chinese Internet Company.
    Qu G; Zhang Z; Qu W; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32392876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fuzzy AHP approach for prioritizing electronic waste management options: a case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Khoshand A; Rahimi K; Ehteshami M; Gharaei S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(10):9649-9660. PubMed ID: 30729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Social Hotspot analysis of the e-waste sector in Ghana and Nigeria.
    Traverso M; Mankaa R; Concetta Pedalá M; Covais A
    Waste Manag; 2024 Jun; 183():271-277. PubMed ID: 38781818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying, evaluating and prioritizing the causes of occupational accidents in the construction industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Abbasinia M; Mohammadfam I
    Work; 2022; 72(3):933-940. PubMed ID: 35634821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A review of various strategies in e-waste management in line with circular economics.
    Pouyamanesh S; Kowsari E; Ramakrishna S; Chinnappan A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(41):93462-93490. PubMed ID: 37572248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A BWM-TOPSIS Hazardous Waste Inventory Safety Risk Evaluation.
    Deng F; Li Y; Lin H; Miao J; Liang X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32784982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating sustainable municipal solid waste management scenarios: A multicriteria decision making approach.
    Mujtaba MA; Munir A; Imran S; Nasir MK; Muhayyuddin MG; Javed A; Mehmood A; Habila MA; Fayaz H; Qazi A
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e25788. PubMed ID: 38404874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
    Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding the barriers to sustainable solid waste management in society 5.0 under uncertainties: a novelty of socials and technical perspectives on performance driving.
    Bui TD; Tseng ML
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(11):16265-16293. PubMed ID: 34648164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Municipal solid waste management: Identification and analysis of technology selection criteria using Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy DEMATEL technique.
    Shanta MH; Choudhury IA; Salman S
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23236. PubMed ID: 38163177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. System dynamics applied to closed loop supply chains of desktops and laptops in Brazil: A perspective for social inclusion of waste pickers.
    Ghisolfi V; Diniz Chaves GL; Ribeiro Siman R; Xavier LH
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():14-31. PubMed ID: 28034614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comprehensive evaluation of green mine construction level considering fuzzy factors using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS with kernel distance.
    Luo D; Huang J; Liang Y; Cheng L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(11):16884-16898. PubMed ID: 38329664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revisiting e-waste management practices in selected African countries.
    Bimir MN
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Jul; 70(7):659-669. PubMed ID: 32401631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. EPR policies for electronics in developing Asia: an adapted phase-in approach.
    Akenji L; Hotta Y; Bengtsson M; Hayashi S
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Sep; 29(9):919-30. PubMed ID: 21730041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pilot study on the internal exposure to heavy metals of informal-level electronic waste workers in Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana.
    Wittsiepe J; Feldt T; Till H; Burchard G; Wilhelm M; Fobil JN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):3097-3107. PubMed ID: 27858271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health, safety, and environmental failure evaluation by hybridizing fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making methods for maritime scrubber systems.
    Başhan V; Yucesan M; Demirel H; Gul M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):641. PubMed ID: 35930143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
    Chung ES; Kim Y
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critical factors for implementing collection target responsibility in e-waste collection in China: A DEMATEL-ISM analysis.
    Yin H; Qu Y; Guo L
    Waste Manag; 2023 Dec; 172():278-289. PubMed ID: 37931547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.