These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3277514)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. Is clinical efficacy established after the first decade?
    Kent DL; Larson EB
    Ann Intern Med; 1988 Mar; 108(3):402-24. PubMed ID: 3277514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: theory and application to the central nervous system.
    Bronen RA; Sze G
    J Neurosurg; 1990 Dec; 73(6):820-39. PubMed ID: 2230966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in neuroimaging.
    Kent DL; Haynor DR; Longstreth WT; Larson EB
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 May; 120(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 7818632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [MR vs CT: which is the diagnostic advantage in neuroradiology].
    Cirillo S; Simonetti L; La Tessa G; Elefante R; Smaltino F
    Radiol Med; 1988 Nov; 76(5):390-8. PubMed ID: 3205917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine.
    Hadley DM; Teasdale GM
    J Neurol; 1988 Mar; 235(4):193-206. PubMed ID: 3286826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of diseases of the brain and spinal cord].
    Scotti G; Scialfa G; Landoni L
    Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):3-16. PubMed ID: 4023303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord.
    Bradley WG; Waluch V; Yadley RA; Wycoff RR
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 6463251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. computed tomography: advantages and disadvantages.
    Earnest F; Baker HL; Kispert DB; Laws ER
    Clin Neurosurg; 1985; 32():540-73. PubMed ID: 3905153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of MR contrast agents in the evaluation of disease of the spine.
    Jinkins JR; Runge VM
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 7(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 7654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis.
    Miller DH; Grossman RI; Reingold SC; McFarland HF
    Brain; 1998 Jan; 121 ( Pt 1)():3-24. PubMed ID: 9549485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.
    Kent DL; Haynor DR; Larson EB; Deyo RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):1135-44. PubMed ID: 1533084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posttraumatic spinal cord lesions without skeletal or discal and ligamentous abnormalities: the role of MR imaging.
    Paleologos TS; Fratzoglou MM; Papadopoulos SS; Chatzidakis EE; Gouliamos AD; Kourousis DD
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Aug; 11(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 9726306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of spinal cord MRI to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
    Simon JH
    J Neurol Sci; 2000 Jan; 172 Suppl 1():S32-5. PubMed ID: 10606803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system. Council on Scientific Affairs. Report of the Panel on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(8):1211-22. PubMed ID: 3276947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in suspected lesions in the posterior cranial fossa.
    Teasdale GM; Hadley DM; Lawrence A; Bone I; Burton H; Grant R; Condon B; Macpherson P; Rowan J
    BMJ; 1989 Aug; 299(6695):349-55. PubMed ID: 2506965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging of the spine in multiple sclerosis.
    Hickman SJ; Miller DH
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2000 Nov; 10(4):689-704 ,viii. PubMed ID: 11359719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical myelopathy: a comparison of magnetic resonance and myelography.
    Masaryk TJ; Modic MT; Geisinger MA; Standefer J; Hardy RW; Boumphrey F; Duchesneau PM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1986; 10(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 3950143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [MR tomography of non-tumor diseases of the brain and cervical cord].
    Ostertun B; Dewes W; Süss H; Steudel A; Brassel H; Harder T
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 2834788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.