142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32775447)
1. The Biomechanical Analysis of Magnitude and Direction of Force by Different Techniques of Thoracic Spinal Manipulation.
Joo S; Kim J; Lee Y; Song C
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8928071. PubMed ID: 32775447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of preload forces in spinal manipulation: experimental investigation of kinematic and electromyographic responses in healthy adults.
Nougarou F; Dugas C; Loranger M; Pagé I; Descarreaux M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014 Jun; 37(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24928637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of thoracic spinal manipulation and mobilization forces in older adults.
Funabashi M; Son J; Pecora CG; Tran S; Lee J; Howarth SJ; Kawchuk G; de Luca K
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Oct; 89():105450. PubMed ID: 34450432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy.
Herzog W; Conway PJ; Kawchuk GN; Zhang Y; Hasler EM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Jul; 18(9):1206-12. PubMed ID: 8362328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reaction Force Magnitude and Orientation During Supine Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation: An Exploratory Analysis and Reliability of Preload and Impulse Phase.
Dugailly PM; Michaud A; Feipel V; Beyer B
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2020; 43(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 32593464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of the factors influencing spinal manipulative therapy force transmission through the thorax: a cadaveric study.
Mikhail J; Funabashi M; Sobczak S; Descarreaux M; Pagé I
Chiropr Man Therap; 2023 Aug; 31(1):24. PubMed ID: 37550682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Force transmission between thoracic and cervical segments of the spine during prone-lying high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation: A proof of principle for the concept of regional interdependence.
Engell S; Triano JJ; Howarth SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Oct; 69():58-63. PubMed ID: 31302490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of Forces at the Clinician-Patient and Patient-Table Interfaces During Thoracic Spinal Manipulation in Asymptomatic Adults Are Consistent With Deformable Body Models.
Thomas J; Murphy T; Tran S; Howarth SJ; Starmer D; Funabashi M
J Appl Biomech; 2022 Feb; 38(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 35061998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing forces during spinal manipulation and mobilization: factors influencing the difference between forces at the patient-table and clinician-patient interfaces.
Mikhail J; Funabashi M; Descarreaux M; Pagé I
Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Nov; 28(1):57. PubMed ID: 33168008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electromyographic reflex responses to mechanical force, manually assisted spinal manipulative therapy.
Colloca CJ; Keller TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 11413422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The frictional properties at the thoracic skin-fascia interface: implications in spine manipulation.
Bereznick DE; Ross JK; McGill SM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 May; 17(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 12034123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of thoracic manipulation on posteroanterior spinal stiffness.
Campbell BD; Snodgrass SJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Nov; 40(11):685-93. PubMed ID: 20710095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of spinal manipulative therapy biomechanical parameters on clinical and biomechanical outcomes of participants with chronic thoracic pain: a randomized controlled experimental trial.
Pagé I; Descarreaux M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 30658622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Gunzburg R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(9):567-78. PubMed ID: 14673406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician-applied contact pressure and table force response during unilateral thoracic manipulation.
Kirstukas SJ; Backman JA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1999 Jun; 22(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 10395429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in force-time parameters and electromyographic characteristics of two high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations following one another in quick succession.
Gorrell LM; Conway PJ; Herzog W
Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Dec; 28(1):67. PubMed ID: 33287851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation.
Herzog W; Kats M; Symons B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):2105-10; discussion 2110-1. PubMed ID: 11698887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Oct; 25(8):485-96. PubMed ID: 12381970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forces and relative vertebral movements during SMT to unembalmed post-rigor human cadavers: peculiarities associated with joint cavitation.
Gál JM; Herzog W; Kawchuk GN; Conway PJ; Zhang YT
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jan; 18(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 7706960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Induced Reaction Forces and Moments Are Influenced by Variations in Spinal Manipulative Technique.
D'Angelo K; Triano JJ; Kawchuk GN; Howarth SJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jan; 42(2):E71-E77. PubMed ID: 27270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
