106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32776319)
1. Automatic detection of symmetry plane for computer-aided surgical simulation in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
Noori SMR; Farnia P; Bayat M; Bahrami N; Shakourirad A; Ahmadian A
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Sep; 43(3):1087-1099. PubMed ID: 32776319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic virtual reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects assisted by ICP (iterative closest point) algorithm and normal people database.
Jie B; Han B; Yao B; Zhang Y; Liao H; He Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 34564760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning.
De Momi E; Chapuis J; Pappas I; Ferrigno G; Hallermann W; Schramm A; Caversaccio M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 35(7):636-42. PubMed ID: 16542822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of mathematical algorithms for automatic patient alignment in radiosurgery.
Williams KM; Schulte RW; Schubert KE; Wroe AJ
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 25782189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull.
Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review on multiplatform evaluations of semi-automatic open-source based image segmentation for cranio-maxillofacial surgery.
Wallner J; Schwaiger M; Hochegger K; Gsaxner C; Zemann W; Egger J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Dec; 182():105102. PubMed ID: 31610359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of three methods for constructing craniofacial mid-sagittal plane based on the cone beam computed tomography].
Wang SW; Li M; Yang HF; Zhao YJ; Wang Y; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Apr; 48(2):330-5. PubMed ID: 27080291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of a Novel Semi-Automatic Technique for Determining the Bilateral Symmetry Plane of the Facial Skeleton of Normal Adult Males.
Roumeliotis G; Willing R; Neuert M; Ahluwalia R; Jenkyn T; Yazdani A
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1997-2001. PubMed ID: 26355983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of algorithms for automated femur fracture reduction.
Suero EM; Westphal R; Citak M; Hawi N; Liodakis E; Omar M; Krettek C; Stuebig T
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28944618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of a semi-automatic technique for determining the bilateral symmetry plane of the facial skeleton.
Willing RT; Roumeliotis G; Jenkyn TR; Yazdani A
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1843-9. PubMed ID: 23891670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of computer-aided three-dimensional skull model with rapid prototyping technique in repair of zygomatico-orbito-maxillary complex fracture.
Li WZ; Zhang MC; Li SP; Zhang LT; Huang Y
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19280585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probing real-world Central European population midfacial skeleton symmetry for maxillofacial surgery.
Franke A; Hofmann EC; Steinberg A; Lauer G; Kitzler H; Leonhardt H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5637-5647. PubMed ID: 37535197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of accuracy of three-dimensional spiral computed tomography, standard radiography, and direct measurements in evaluating facial fracture healing in a rat model.
Ozçelik D; Hüthüt I; Kuran I; Bankaoğlu M; Orhan Z; Mayda AS
Ann Plast Surg; 2004 Nov; 53(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 15502465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual reconstruction of unilateral pelvic fractures by using pelvic symmetry.
Ead MS; Westover L; Polege S; McClelland S; Jaremko JL; Duke KK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(8):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 32249403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flip-avoiding interpolating surface registration for skull reconstruction.
Xie S; Leow WK; Lee H; Lim TC
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Aug; 14(4):e1906. PubMed ID: 29603558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of three-dimensional computed tomography in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
Carls FR; Schuknecht B; Sailer HF
J Craniofac Surg; 1994 Nov; 5(5):282-8. PubMed ID: 7833409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of A-mode ultrasound based intraoperative registration in computer-aided orthopedic surgery: A simulation and experimental study.
Niu K; Homminga J; Sluiter VI; Sprengers A; Verdonschot N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199136. PubMed ID: 29897987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Application of Different Surgical Navigation Systems in Complex Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: The Use of Multisurface 3-Dimensional Images and a 2-Plane Reference System.
Liu TJ; Ko AT; Tang YB; Lai HS; Chien HF; Hsieh TM
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Apr; 76(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 25664409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface.
Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19118978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computation of the mid-sagittal plane in 3-D brain images.
Prima S; Ourselin S; Ayache N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Feb; 21(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 11929100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
