These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32778466)

  • 1. Mechanical or biological heart valve for dialysis-dependent patients? A meta-analysis.
    Chi KY; Chiang MH; Kang YN; Li SJ; Chan YT; Chen YC; Wang ST
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Jun; 163(6):2057-2071.e12. PubMed ID: 32778466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis versus bioprosthesis in dialysis patients: A 16-year multicenter experience.
    Ikeno Y; Mukohara N; Fukumura Y; Tobe S; Gan K; Obo H; Yoshida K; Okita Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 158(1):48-56.e4. PubMed ID: 30660406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 20-year multicenter analysis of dialysis-dependent patients who had aortic or mitral valve replacement: Implications for valve selection.
    Manghelli JL; Carter DI; Khiabani AJ; Gauthier JM; Moon MR; Munfakh NA; Damiano RJ; Corvera JS; Melby SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Sep; 158(3):805-813.e2. PubMed ID: 30685160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninferiority of closely monitored mechanical valves to bioprostheses overshadowed by early mortality benefit in younger patients.
    Badhwar V; Ofenloch JC; Rovin JD; van Gelder HM; Jacobs JP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Mar; 93(3):748-53. PubMed ID: 22364968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis or carpentier-edwards perimount bioprosthesis in Japanese patients according to age.
    Nishida T; Sonoda H; Oishi Y; Tatewaki H; Tanoue Y; Shiokawa Y; Tominaga R
    Circ J; 2014; 78(11):2688-95. PubMed ID: 25262964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Surgical Mitral and Aortic Valve Replacements Among Kidney Transplant Candidates: Implications for Valve Selection.
    Ngendahimana DK; Deo SV; Sundaram V; Lentine KL; Herzog CA; Al Dahabreh L; Srinivas TR; Chavin KD; Sarabu N
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Feb; 10(5):e018971. PubMed ID: 33599143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Biological and Mechanical Prostheses for Heart Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kiyose AT; Suzumura EA; Laranjeira L; Buehler AM; Santo JAE; Berwanger O; Carvalho ACC; Paola AA; Moises VA; Cavalcanti AB
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 112(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 30916201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
    Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological or mechanical prostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50-65 years: the ANDALVALVE study.
    Rodríguez-Caulo EA; Macías D; Adsuar A; Ferreiro A; Arias-Dachary J; Parody G; Fernández F; Daroca T; Rodríguez-Mora F; Garrido JM; Muñoz-Carvajal I; Barquero JM; Valderrama JF; Melero JM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jun; 55(6):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 30608571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
    Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.
    Prasongsukarn K; Jamieson WR; Lichtenstein SV
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):501-8, 510-1; discussion 509. PubMed ID: 16116877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosthesis selection for aortic valve replacement in patients on hemodialysis.
    Hori D; Kusadokoro S; Kitada Y; Kimura N; Matsumoto H; Yuri K; Yamaguchi A
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Feb; 68(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 31280413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heart valve prosthesis selection in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chan V; Chen L; Mesana L; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Heart; 2011 Dec; 97(24):2033-7. PubMed ID: 21990382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile more important than prosthesis type?
    Klieverik LM; Noorlander M; Takkenberg JJ; Kappetein AP; Bekkers JA; van Herwerden LA; Bogers AJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):479-87; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 16901039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term results of mechanical and biological heart valves in dialysis and non-dialysis patients.
    Böning A; Boedeker RH; Rosendahl UP; Niemann B; Haberer S; Roth P; Ennker JA
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Dec; 59(8):454-9. PubMed ID: 21544790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valve-related complications in elderly patients with biological and mechanical aortic valves.
    Milano A; Guglielmi C; De Carlo M; Di Gregorio O; Borzoni G; Verunelli F; Bortolotti U
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S82-7. PubMed ID: 9930423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.