BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32778771)

  • 1. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.
    Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
    Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
    J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversion to Disposable Cystoscopes Decreased Post-procedure Encounters and Infections Compared to Reusable Cystoscopes.
    Geldmaker LE; Baird BA; Lyon TD; Regele EJ; Wajswol EJ; Pathak RA; Petrou SP; Haehn DA; Gajarawala NM; Ball CT; Broderick GA; Thiel DD
    Urol Pract; 2023 Jul; 10(4):312-317. PubMed ID: 37228224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes.
    Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Utility of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope Compared with a Standard Reusable Device: A Randomized Noninferiority Study.
    Holmes A; O'Kane D; Wombwell A; Grills R
    J Endourol; 2023 Jan; 37(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 36128833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time Efficiency and Performance of Single-Use
    Chen R; Baas C; Farkouh A; Shete K; Peverini DR; Hartman JC; Amasyali AS; Belle J; Baldwin EA; Baldwin DD
    J Endourol; 2024 Jan; 38(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 37800857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of Single-Use Urologic Endoscopy: Benchtop and Initial Clinical Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope.
    Whelan P; Kim C; Tabib C; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2022 Jan; 36(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 34235971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures.
    Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
    Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
    J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
    Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
    J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
    Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Economics of Cystoscopy: A Microcost Analysis.
    Kenigsberg AP; Gold S; Grant L; Lotan Y
    Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():29-34. PubMed ID: 34010677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
    Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
    World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope: A Multi-Institutional International Study.
    Scotland K; Wong VKF; Chan JYH; Tawfiek E; Chiura A; Chew BH; Bagley D
    J Endourol; 2020 Sep; 34(9):981-986. PubMed ID: 32578453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of hexaminolevulinate based flexible and rigid fluorescence cystoscopy with rigid white light cystoscopy in bladder cancer: results of a prospective Phase II study.
    Witjes JA; Moonen PM; van der Heijden AG
    Eur Urol; 2005 Mar; 47(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 15716194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness of 90-day Single-use Flexible Cystoscope Trial: Single Center Micro-Costing Analysis and User Satisfaction.
    Assmus MA; Krambeck AE; Lee MS; Agarwal DK; Mellon M; Rivera ME; Large T
    Urology; 2022 Sep; 167():61-66. PubMed ID: 35772484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The operative cystoscope with joystick control mechanism of flexible tools inserted into the urinary bladder and the ureter].
    Komiakov BK; Topuzov MÉ; Zubarev VA; Stetsik OV
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2014; 173(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 25055539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An In Vitro Study of a New Device: Evaluation of Novel Wide-Angle Lens Flexible Cystoscope Using Phantom Bladder Model.
    Yamaguchi K; Inoue T; Habuchi T; Inokuchi J; Yokomizo A; Eto M; Kanayama HO
    J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1073-1078. PubMed ID: 28726499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workflow efficiencies for flexible cystoscopy: comparing single-use vs reusable cystoscopes.
    Haislip I; Rindorf D; Cool C; Tester B
    BMC Urol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):53. PubMed ID: 38448827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The flexible cystoscope.
    Pavone-Macaluso M; Lamartina M; Pavone C; Vella M
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1992; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 1399380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.