245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32778912)
21. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.
Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Roberts MJ; Sauer M; Beyersdorff D; Boiko S; Maurer T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34555925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings.
Bjurlin MA; Rosenkrantz AB; Sarkar S; Lepor H; Huang WC; Huang R; Venkataraman R; Taneja SS
Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():112-120. PubMed ID: 29155186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combined systematic versus stand-alone multiparametric MRI-guided targeted fusion biopsy: nomogram prediction of non-organ-confined prostate cancer.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Karakiewicz PI; Beyersdorff D; Pompe RS; Oh-Hohenhorst SJ; Fisch M; Maurer T; Graefen M; Budäus L
World J Urol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 32248363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predicting the Need for Biopsy to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-detected Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert ≥3 Lesion: Development and Multinational External Validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis Risk Score.
Peters M; Eldred-Evans D; Kurver P; Falagario UG; Connor MJ; Shah TT; Verhoeff JJC; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Montoya Perez I; Ettala O; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Briganti A; Lantz A; Picker W; Haug ES; Nordström T; Tanaka MB; Reddy D; Bass E; van Rossum PSN; Wong K; Tam H; Winkler M; Gordon S; Qazi H; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol; 2022 Nov; 82(5):559-568. PubMed ID: 35963650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool.
Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimizing prostate-targeted biopsy schemes in men with multiple mpMRI visible lesions: should we target all suspicious areas? Results of a two institution series.
Stabile A; Barletta F; Motterle G; Pellegrino F; Sorce G; Mazzone E; Scuderi S; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Dec; 24(4):1137-1142. PubMed ID: 33941867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development and External Validation of a Prediction Model to Identify Candidates for Prostate Biopsy.
Wagaskar VG; Lantz A; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines Iii K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Urol J; 2022 Nov; 19(5):379-385. PubMed ID: 34978065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI- and microultrasound-targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion: a single-institutional study.
Avolio PP; Fasulo V; Sanchez-Salas R; Maffei D; Frego N; Lazzeri M; Paciotti M; Saita A; Hurle R; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM; Lughezzani G
World J Urol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 37418017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
