These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32778912)

  • 21. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
    Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.
    Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Roberts MJ; Sauer M; Beyersdorff D; Boiko S; Maurer T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
    J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34555925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tailoring biopsy strategy in the MRI-fusion prostate biopsy era: systematic, targeted or neither?
    Jäderling F; Bergman M; Engel JC; Mortezavi A; Picker W; Haug ES; Eklund M; Nordström T
    BMC Urol; 2024 Aug; 24(1):168. PubMed ID: 39112967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
    Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
    Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
    Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
    Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings.
    Bjurlin MA; Rosenkrantz AB; Sarkar S; Lepor H; Huang WC; Huang R; Venkataraman R; Taneja SS
    Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():112-120. PubMed ID: 29155186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combined systematic versus stand-alone multiparametric MRI-guided targeted fusion biopsy: nomogram prediction of non-organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Karakiewicz PI; Beyersdorff D; Pompe RS; Oh-Hohenhorst SJ; Fisch M; Maurer T; Graefen M; Budäus L
    World J Urol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 32248363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
    Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
    Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
    Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting the Need for Biopsy to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-detected Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert ≥3 Lesion: Development and Multinational External Validation of the Imperial Rapid Access to Prostate Imaging and Diagnosis Risk Score.
    Peters M; Eldred-Evans D; Kurver P; Falagario UG; Connor MJ; Shah TT; Verhoeff JJC; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Montoya Perez I; Ettala O; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Briganti A; Lantz A; Picker W; Haug ES; Nordström T; Tanaka MB; Reddy D; Bass E; van Rossum PSN; Wong K; Tam H; Winkler M; Gordon S; Qazi H; Boström PJ; Jambor I; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol; 2022 Nov; 82(5):559-568. PubMed ID: 35963650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Opportunistic Prostate Cancer Screening with Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (VISIONING).
    Wetterauer C; Matthias M; Pueschel H; Deckart A; Bubendorf L; Mortezavi A; Arbelaez E; Jean Winkel D; Heye T; Boll DT; Merkle E; Hayoz S; Seifert HH; Rentsch CA
    Eur Urol Focus; 2024 Mar; 10(2):332-338. PubMed ID: 38402105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
    Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool.
    Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
    Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
    Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing prostate-targeted biopsy schemes in men with multiple mpMRI visible lesions: should we target all suspicious areas? Results of a two institution series.
    Stabile A; Barletta F; Motterle G; Pellegrino F; Sorce G; Mazzone E; Scuderi S; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Dec; 24(4):1137-1142. PubMed ID: 33941867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and External Validation of a Prediction Model to Identify Candidates for Prostate Biopsy.
    Wagaskar VG; Lantz A; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines Iii K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
    Urol J; 2022 Nov; 19(5):379-385. PubMed ID: 34978065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.