122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32779475)
1. 100 Robotic Distal Pancreatectomies: The Future at Hand.
Rosemurgy AS; Luberice K; Krill E; Castro M; Espineira GR; Sucandy I; Ross S
Am Surg; 2020 Aug; 86(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 32779475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now.
Rosemurgy A; Ross S; Bourdeau T; Craigg D; Spence J; Alvior J; Sucandy I
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):613-624. PubMed ID: 30682410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.
Epelboym I; Gawlas I; Lee JA; Schrope B; Chabot JA; Allendorf JD
World J Surg; 2014 Jun; 38(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 24407939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy: a robotic or LESS approach.
Ryan CE; Ross SB; Sukharamwala PB; Sadowitz BD; Wood TW; Rosemurgy AS
JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00246. PubMed ID: 25848192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Weighing the outcomes: the role of BMI in complex robotic esophageal and hepatobiliary operations.
Rayman S; Ross SB; Sucandy I; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
Updates Surg; 2024 Jun; 76(3):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 38460102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Body Mass Index on Patients' Outcomes Following Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy.
Jacoby H; Ross S; Sucandy I; Syblis C; Crespo K; Vasanthakumar P; Trotto M; Rosemurgy A
JSLS; 2023; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 37304928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Analysis of NSQIP National Outcomes and Projected Outcomes versus Our Institutional Outcomes for Robotic Gastrectomy: The Future of Gastric Resection.
Ross SB; Slavin M; Sucandy I; Crespo KL; Syblis CC; Saravanan S; Rosemurgy AS
Am Surg; 2023 Sep; 89(9):3757-3763. PubMed ID: 37217206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.
Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Complications Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy at a National Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Lone Z; Hall S; Terakawa T; Ahmed YE; Elsayed AS; Aldhaam N; May PR; Miller A; Jing Z; Bragayrac LN; Khan H; Cohen J; Cole A; Rana O; Kanapan R; Prechtl C; Hussein AA; Guru KA
J Endourol; 2019 May; 33(5):383-388. PubMed ID: 30869541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource.
Parikh P; Shiloach M; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Ko CY; Hall BL; Pitt HA
HPB (Oxford); 2010 Sep; 12(7):488-97. PubMed ID: 20815858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges in robotic distal pancreatectomy: systematic review of current practice.
Guerra F; Pesi B; Amore Bonapasta S; Di Marino M; Perna F; Annecchiarico M; Coratti A
Minerva Chir; 2015 Aug; 70(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 25916194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
Blair BM; Lehman EB; Jafri SM; Kaag MG; Raman JD
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 29868938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective?
Waters JA; Canal DF; Wiebke EA; Dumas RP; Beane JD; Aguilar-Saavedra JR; Ball CG; House MG; Zyromski NJ; Nakeeb A; Pitt HA; Lillemoe KD; Schmidt CM
Surgery; 2010 Oct; 148(4):814-23. PubMed ID: 20797748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy - The first meta-analysis.
Gavriilidis P; Lim C; Menahem B; Lahat E; Salloum C; Azoulay D
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Jul; 18(7):567-74. PubMed ID: 27346136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: greatest benefit for the frail.
Konstantinidis IT; Lewis A; Lee B; Warner SG; Woo Y; Singh G; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5234-5240. PubMed ID: 28493165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced morbidity with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Plotkin A; Ceppa EP; Zarzaur BL; Kilbane EM; Riall TS; Pitt HA
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Mar; 19(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 28161217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic total pancreatectomy with splenectomy: technique and outcomes.
Konstantinidis IT; Jutric Z; Eng OS; Warner SG; Melstrom LG; Fong Y; Lee B; Singh G
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3691-3696. PubMed ID: 29273875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: Comparison of spleen-preservation by the Warshaw technique and splenectomy.
Wang SE; Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Oct; 14(5):e1922. PubMed ID: 29745464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Power of the NSQIP Risk Calculator for Early Post-Operative Outcomes After Whipple: Experience from a Regional Center in Northern Ontario.
Jiang HY; Kohtakangas EL; Asai K; Shum JB
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2018 Sep; 49(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 28462447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single institution experience with 30 consecutive cases.
Goh BKP; Low TY; Lee SY; Chan CY; Chung AYF; Ooi LLPJ
ANZ J Surg; 2019 Mar; 89(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 29799169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
