These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32779714)

  • 21. Irradiation provided by dental radiological procedures in a pediatric population.
    Hedesiu M; Marcu M; Salmon B; Pauwels R; Oenning AC; Almasan O; Roman R; Baciut M; Jacobs R;
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():112-117. PubMed ID: 29803375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.
    Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Chen L; Altunbas MC; Liu X; Han T; Wang T; Yang WT; Whitman GJ; Tu SJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2995-3004. PubMed ID: 17822008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery.
    Hasani A; Ahmadi Moshtaghin F; Roohi P; Rakhshan V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27810140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A review of dental cone-beam CT dose conversion coefficients.
    Mah E; Ritenour ER; Yao H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Mar; 50(3):20200225. PubMed ID: 33112658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new formula for converting dose-area product to effective dose in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pauwels R
    Phys Med; 2023 Aug; 112():102639. PubMed ID: 37441822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hayashi Y; Ito M; Imanishi Y; Watanabe K; Matsumoto K; Arai Y; Honda K
    J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
    Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
    Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mandibular canal-related parameters interpreted in panoramic images and CBCT of mandibular third molars as risk factors to predict sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Schropp L; Wenzel A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1094-1101. PubMed ID: 30975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
    Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surface radiation dose comparison of a dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) machine in pediatric ankle and wrist phantoms.
    Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Apfaltrer G; Riccabona M; Singer G; Stücklschweiger G; Guss H; Sorantin E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178747. PubMed ID: 28570626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CBCT technology for diagnosis and treatment planning: what general practitioners should consider.
    Jansen CE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):749-53; quiz 754, 756. PubMed ID: 25454528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
    Felix RP; Shinkai RSA; Rockenbach MIB
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ESTIMATING RADIATION DOSE TO MAJOR ORGANS IN DENTAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: A PHANTOM STUDY.
    Li Y; Huang B; Cao J; Fang T; Liu G; Li X; Wu J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 33320946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reference doses for dental radiography.
    Napier ID
    Br Dent J; 1999 Apr; 186(8):392-6. PubMed ID: 10365461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
    Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.