These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32779786)

  • 1. Mendelian randomisation approaches to the study of prenatal exposures: A systematic review.
    Diemer EW; Labrecque JA; Neumann A; Tiemeier H; Swanson SA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 35(1):130-142. PubMed ID: 32779786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: A mendelian randomisation analysis.
    Thompson WD; Tyrrell J; Borges MC; Beaumont RN; Knight BA; Wood AR; Ring SM; Hattersley AT; Freathy RM; Lawlor DA
    PLoS Med; 2019 Jun; 16(6):e1002828. PubMed ID: 31211782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
    Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
    Carter AR; Sanderson E; Hammerton G; Richmond RC; Davey Smith G; Heron J; Taylor AE; Davies NM; Howe LD
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 36(5):465-478. PubMed ID: 33961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bounding the average causal effect in Mendelian randomisation studies with multiple proposed instruments: An application to prenatal alcohol exposure and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Diemer EW; Havdahl A; Andreassen OA; Munafò MR; Njolstad PR; Tiemeier H; Zuccolo L; Swanson SA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2023 May; 37(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 36722651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the current state of Mendelian randomization studies: a protocol for a systematic review on methodological and clinical aspects using neurodegenerative disorders as outcome.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; König IR
    Syst Rev; 2018 Sep; 7(1):145. PubMed ID: 30249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological approaches, challenges, and opportunities in the application of Mendelian randomisation to lifecourse epidemiology: A systematic literature review.
    Power GM; Sanderson E; Pagoni P; Fraser A; Morris T; Prince C; Frayling TM; Heron J; Richardson TG; Richmond R; Tyrrell J; Warrington N; Davey Smith G; Howe LD; Tilling KM
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):501-520. PubMed ID: 37938447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods.
    Yu Y; Hou L; Shi X; Sun X; Liu X; Yu Y; Yuan Z; Li H; Xue F
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010107. PubMed ID: 35298462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review.
    Spiga F; Gibson M; Dawson S; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Munafò MR; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 52(1):227-249. PubMed ID: 35900265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the Instrumental Inequalities to a Mendelian Randomization Study With Multiple Proposed Instruments.
    Diemer EW; Labrecque J; Tiemeier H; Swanson SA
    Epidemiology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 31790379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
    Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the transparency of reporting in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization studies using the MR-Base platform.
    Woolf B; Di Cara N; Moreno-Stokoe C; Skrivankova V; Drax K; Higgins JPT; Hemani G; Munafò MR; Davey Smith G; Yarmolinsky J; Richmond RC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1943-1956. PubMed ID: 35383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach.
    Zou L; Guo H; Berzuini C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 33287714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of detrimental effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on offspring birthweight and neurodevelopment from a systematic review of quasi-experimental studies.
    Mamluk L; Jones T; Ijaz S; Edwards HB; Savović J; Leach V; Moore THM; von Hinke S; Lewis SJ; Donovan JL; Lawlor DA; Davey Smith G; Fraser A; Zuccolo L
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 49(6):1972-1995. PubMed ID: 31993631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
    Wang LN; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome.
    Greco M FD; Minelli C; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2926-40. PubMed ID: 25950993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of Mendelian randomisation to identify causal cancer risk factors: promise and limitations.
    Gala H; Tomlinson I
    J Pathol; 2020 Apr; 250(5):541-554. PubMed ID: 32154591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.