These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32781913)

  • 1. Effect of shoe cushioning on landing impact forces and spatiotemporal parameters during running: results from a randomized trial including 800+ recreational runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Meyer C; Gette P; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2021 Jul; 21(7):985-993. PubMed ID: 32781913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower impact forces but greater burden for the musculoskeletal system in running shoes with greater cushioning stiffness.
    Malisoux L; Gette P; Backes A; Delattre N; Theisen D
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Feb; 23(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 35014593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shoe Cushioning Influences the Running Injury Risk According to Body Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving 848 Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):473-480. PubMed ID: 31877062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Gette P; Backes A; Delattre N; Cabri J; Theisen D
    Front Sports Act Living; 2021; 3():744658. PubMed ID: 34859204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal and Ground-Reaction Force Characteristics as Risk Factors for Running-Related Injury: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial Including 800+ Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Gette P; Delattre N; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Feb; 50(2):537-544. PubMed ID: 35049407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shoe cushioning, body mass and running biomechanics as risk factors for running injury: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017379. PubMed ID: 28827268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.
    Clarke TE; Frederick EC; Cooper LB
    Int J Sports Med; 1983 Nov; 4(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 6654550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.
    Baltich J; Maurer C; Nigg BM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125196. PubMed ID: 25897963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ground Reaction Force Differences between Bionic Shoes and Neutral Running Shoes in Recreational Male Runners before and after a 5 km Run.
    Jiang X; Zhou H; Quan W; Hu Q; Baker JS; Gu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(18):. PubMed ID: 34574713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do running speed and shoe cushioning influence impact loading and tibial shock in basketball players?
    Lam WK; Liebenberg J; Woo J; Park SK; Yoon SH; Cheung RT; Ryu J
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4753. PubMed ID: 29770274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Jan; 23(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 31501022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 6-Week Transition to Maximal Running Shoes Does Not Change Running Biomechanics.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):968-973. PubMed ID: 30870034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies.
    Dinato RC; Ribeiro AP; Butugan MK; Pereira IL; Onodera AN; Sacco IC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jan; 18(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 24444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leg and Joint Stiffness Adaptations to Minimalist and Maximalist Running Shoes.
    Gruber AH; Zhang S; Pan J; Li L
    J Appl Biomech; 2021 Oct; 37(5):408-414. PubMed ID: 34284352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinetics and perception of basketball landing in various heights and footwear cushioning.
    Wei Q; Wang Z; Woo J; Liebenberg J; Park SK; Ryu J; Lam WK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201758. PubMed ID: 30092009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.
    Sun X; Lam WK; Zhang X; Wang J; Fu W
    J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Mar; 19(1):20-37. PubMed ID: 32132824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shoe cushioning reduces impact and muscle activation during landings from unexpected, but not self-initiated, drops.
    Fu W; Fang Y; Gu Y; Huang L; Li L; Liu Y
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Oct; 20(10):915-920. PubMed ID: 28385562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Maximal Running Shoes on Biomechanics Before and After a 5K Run.
    Pollard CD; Ter Har JA; Hannigan JJ; Norcross MF
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 Jun; 6(6):2325967118775720. PubMed ID: 29900183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Running in highly cushioned shoes increases leg stiffness and amplifies impact loading.
    Kulmala JP; Kosonen J; Nurminen J; Avela J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17496. PubMed ID: 30504822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.