130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32782221)
1. Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Needle Biopsy Outcomes of Non-calcified Mammographic Lesions.
Porembka JH; Compton L; Schmidt S; Polat D; Xi Y; Sarode V; Dogan BE
Acad Radiol; 2021 Dec; 28(12):1739-1747. PubMed ID: 32782221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency of Discordant Lesions and False-negative Cancers at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy.
Heller SL; Jaglan S; Babb JS; Melsaether A; Toth HB; Moy L
Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 27161209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature.
Jackman RJ; Marzoni FA; Rosenberg J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):341-51. PubMed ID: 19155393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Non-Calcified Specimen Pathology on the Underestimation of Malignancy for the Incomplete Retrieval of Suspicious Calcifications Diagnosed as Flat Epithelial Atypia or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia by Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy.
Yu CC; Cheung YC; Ueng SH; Chen SC
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 32729266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benign breast papillomas without atypia diagnosed with core needle biopsy: Outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.
Polat DS; Knippa EE; Ganti R; Seiler SJ; Goudreau SH
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109237. PubMed ID: 32905954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging Adherence.
Gao Y; Albert M; Young Lin LL; Lewin AA; Babb JS; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 29378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Choice of imaging method in the work-up of non-calcified breast lesions identified on tomosynthesis screening.
Porembka JH; Baydoun S; Mootz AR; Xi Y; Dogan BE
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109203. PubMed ID: 32771916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy results for non-palpable breast lesions.
Agacayak F; Ozturk A; Bozdogan A; Selamoglu D; Alco G; Ordu C; Pilanci KN; Killi R; Ozmen V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5171-4. PubMed ID: 25040970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.
Polat DS; Schopp JG; Arjmandi F; Porembka J; Sarode V; Farr D; Xi Y; Dogan BE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jan; 185(2):479-494. PubMed ID: 33010022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic findings after 14-gauge automated needle and 14-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsies.
Burbank F
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsies on a digital breast 3D-tomosynthesis system.
Viala J; Gignier P; Perret B; Hovasse C; Hovasse D; Chancelier-Galan MD; Bornet G; Hamrouni A; Lasry JL; Convard JP
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 23252555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate Migration of Biopsy Clip Markers After Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy.
Teichgraeber DC; Martaindale S; Omofoye TS; Hess KR; Parikh JR; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 31076332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Large-Volume Breast Biopsy (MR-Guided VALB).
Schrading S; Strobel K; Keulers A; Dirrichs T; Kuhl CK
Invest Radiol; 2017 Mar; 52(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy With Benign Results Does Not Negatively Affect Future Screening Adherence.
Lewin AA; Gao Y; Lin Young LL; Albert ML; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Apr; 15(4):622-629. PubMed ID: 29433804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
