BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32783410)

  • 1. Comparison of Urologist Satisfaction for Different Types of Prostate MRI Reports: A Large Sample Investigation.
    Zhong J; Qin W; Li Y; Wang Y; Huan Y; Ren J
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1326-1333. PubMed ID: 32783410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Radiologists' and Urologists' Opinions Regarding Prostate MRI Reporting: Results From a Survey of Specialty Societies.
    Spilseth B; Ghai S; Patel NU; Taneja SS; Margolis DJ; Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 29064758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate MRI evolution in clinical practice: Audit of tumour detection and staging versus prostatectomy with staged introduction of multiparametric MRI and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 reporting.
    Raeside M; Low A; Cohen P; Sutherland P; Gormly K
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 30951248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structured reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to improve interdisciplinary communication.
    Wetterauer C; Winkel DJ; Federer-Gsponer JR; Halla A; Subotic S; Deckart A; Seifert HH; Boll DT; Ebbing J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212444. PubMed ID: 30779810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologists' preferences regarding content of prostate MRI reports: a survey of the Society of Abdominal Radiology.
    Spilseth B; Margolis DJ; Ghai S; Patel NU; Rosenkrantz AB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1807-1812. PubMed ID: 29128994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: what the urologist needs to know.
    Kiechle J; Pahwa S; Gulani V; Kanaan G; Sedelaar J; Ponsky L
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2015 Sep; 67(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 26054410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions.
    Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions.
    Padhani AR; Weinreb J; Rosenkrantz AB; Villeirs G; Turkbey B; Barentsz J
    Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):385-396. PubMed ID: 29908876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: interpretation using the PI-RADS V2.
    Torregrosa Andrés A; Otero García M; Sineiro Galiñanes M
    Radiologia; 2017; 59(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 28012730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score.
    Martorana E; Pirola GM; Scialpi M; Micali S; Iseppi A; Bonetti LR; Kaleci S; Torricelli P; Bianchi G
    BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 27608292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy.
    Renard-Penna R; Mozer P; Cornud F; Barry-Delongchamps N; Bruguière E; Portalez D; Malavaud B
    Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):458-68. PubMed ID: 25599415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the target prior to prostate fusion biopsy: the effect of MRI reporting on cancer detection.
    Westhoff N; Siegel F; Peter C; Hetjens S; Porubsky S; Martini T; von Hardenberg J; Michel MS; Budjan J; Ritter M
    World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):327-335. PubMed ID: 29967946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.
    Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M
    BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
    Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-Based Reporting: A Method to Optimize Prostate MRI Communications With Referring Physicians.
    Magnetta MJ; Donovan AL; Jacobs BL; Davies BJ; Furlan A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):108-112. PubMed ID: 29091009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local Staging of Prostate Cancer at MRI: What the Urologist and Radiation Oncologist Want to Know.
    Gottumukkala RV; Lee LK; Tu W; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Radiographics; 2023 Sep; 43(9):e220100. PubMed ID: 37561642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.