These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32783533)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals.
    Yu L; Miao M; Liu W; Zhang B; Zhang P
    Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):95-114. PubMed ID: 32783533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
    Okonta P; Rossouw T
    Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers.
    Palla IA; Singson M
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):63-94. PubMed ID: 32718198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers' Perceptions in Spain.
    Feenstra RA; Delgado López-Cózar E; Pallarés-Domínguez D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jan; 27(1):1. PubMed ID: 33492516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.
    Pupovac V; Prijić-Samaržija S; Petrovečki M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Feb; 23(1):165-181. PubMed ID: 26940319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 32487190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.
    Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
    J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India.
    Dhingra D; Mishra D
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 11(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 24727622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.
    Kaiser M; Drivdal L; Hjellbrekke J; Ingierd H; Rekdal OB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Dec; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 34932191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
    Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [How to avoid research misconduct - recommendations for surgeons].
    Pitak-Arnnop P; Schouman T; Bertrand JC; Hervé C
    J Chir (Paris); 2008; 145(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 19106883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research.
    Kwee RM; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee TC
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110553. PubMed ID: 36228454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):302-319. PubMed ID: 32613889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing.
    Lazarides MK; Gougoudi E; Papanas N
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2019 Dec; 18(4):350-353. PubMed ID: 31464160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct.
    Kearney M; Downing M; Gignac EA
    J Osteopath Med; 2024 May; 124(5):187-194. PubMed ID: 38407191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.