141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32783630)
1. Optimisation of tube voltage range (kVp) for AP abdomen, pelvis and spine imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system using a computer simulator.
Moore CS; Wood T; Balcam S; Needler L; Guest T; Ngu WP; Chong LW; Saunderson J; Beavis A
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20200565. PubMed ID: 32783630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a computer simulator to investigate optimized tube voltage for chest imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood T; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Ahmed N; Saunderson J; Beavis A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 92(1104):20190470. PubMed ID: 31559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI?
Li X; Morgan AG; Liptak CL; Muryn JS; Dong FF; Primak AN; Segars WP
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6258-68. PubMed ID: 26520718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-layer detector CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis with a one-third iodine dose: image quality, radiation dose, and optimal monoenergetic settings.
Nagayama Y; Nakaura T; Oda S; Taguchi N; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Kidoh M; Namimoto T; Sakabe D; Hatemura M; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2018 Dec; 73(12):1058.e21-1058.e29. PubMed ID: 30237063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e174-e179. PubMed ID: 30269955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for the optimisation of chest radiographic techniques for computed radiography imaging systems.
Moore CS; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Swift A; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 85(1017):e630-9. PubMed ID: 22253349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality in dual-source multiphasic dynamic computed tomography of the abdomen: evaluating the effects of a low tube voltage (70 kVp) in combination with contrast dose reduction.
Miyoshi K; Onoda H; Tanabe M; Nakao S; Higashi M; Iida E; Okada M; Furukawa M; Ito K
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Nov; 45(11):3755-3762. PubMed ID: 32382819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings.
Waaijer A; Prokop M; Velthuis BK; Bakker CJ; de Kort GA; van Leeuwen MS
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 17229873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Röhl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2004 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14734924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
