These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32785808)

  • 1. Unloading using Impella CP during profound cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure in a large animal model: impact on the right ventricle.
    Josiassen J; Helgestad OKL; Udesen NLJ; Banke A; Frederiksen PH; Hyldebrandt JA; Schmidt H; Jensen LO; Hassager C; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    Intensive Care Med Exp; 2020 Aug; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 32785808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock.
    Udesen NLJ; Helgestad OKL; Banke ABS; Frederiksen PH; Josiassen J; Jensen LO; Schmidt H; Edelman ER; Chang BY; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    Crit Care; 2020 Mar; 24(1):95. PubMed ID: 32188462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impella CP or VA-ECMO in profound cardiogenic shock: left ventricular unloading and organ perfusion in a large animal model.
    Møller-Helgestad OK; Hyldebrandt JA; Banke A; Rud CS; Udesen NLJ; Linde L; Okkels-Jensen L; Schmidt H; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Feb; 14(15):e1585-e1592. PubMed ID: 30418160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Impella RP Versus Vasoactive Treatment on Right and Left Ventricular Strain in a Porcine Model of Acute Cardiogenic Shock Induced by Right Coronary Artery Embolization.
    Frederiksen PH; Josiassen J; Udesen NLJ; Linde L; Helgestad OK; Banke A; Jensen LO; Schmidt H; Hassager C; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Feb; 12(3):e8126. PubMed ID: 36734350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rationale and Design of JenaMACS-Acute Hemodynamic Impact of Ventricular Unloading Using the Impella CP Assist Device in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.
    Haertel F; Lenk K; Fritzenwanger M; Pfeifer R; Franz M; Memisevic N; Otto S; Lauer B; Weingärtner O; Kretzschmar D; Dannberg G; Westphal J; Baez L; Bogoviku J; Schulze PC; Moebius-Winkler S
    J Clin Med; 2022 Aug; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transaortic or Pulmonary Artery Drainage for Left Ventricular Unloading in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support: A Porcine Cardiogenic Shock Model.
    Meani P; Mlcek M; Kowalewski M; Raffa GM; Popkova M; Pilato M; Arcadipane A; Belohlavek J; Lorusso R
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021; 33(3):724-732. PubMed ID: 33171234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impella RP Versus Pharmacologic Vasoactive Treatment in Profound Cardiogenic Shock due to Right Ventricular Failure.
    Josiassen J; Helgestad OKL; Udesen NLJ; Banke A; Frederiksen PH; Schmidt H; Jensen LO; Hassager C; Møller JE; Ravn HB
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2021 Dec; 14(6):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 33977379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biventricular Compared to Left Ventricular Impella and Norepinephrine Support in a Porcine Model of Severe Cardiogenic Shock.
    Udesen NLJ; Josiassen J; K L Helgestad O; Banke ABS; Frederiksen PH; Jensen LO; Schmidt H; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    ASAIO J; 2022 Sep; 68(9):1141-1148. PubMed ID: 34967781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring a Mystery: The Unknown Right Ventricle during Left Ventricular Unloading with Impella in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.
    Markus B; Kreutz J; Chatzis G; Syntila S; Choukeir M; Schieffer B; Patsalis N
    J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 38592106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left Ventricular Unloading Using an Impella CP Improves Coronary Flow and Infarct Zone Perfusion in Ischemic Heart Failure.
    Watanabe S; Fish K; Kovacic JC; Bikou O; Leonardson L; Nomoto K; Aguero J; Kapur NK; Hajjar RJ; Ishikawa K
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Mar; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 29514806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "TIDE"-Algorithm for the Weaning of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Temporarily Mechanical Left Ventricular Support With Impella Devices. A Cardiovascular Physiology-Based Approach.
    Tschöpe C; Spillmann F; Potapov E; Faragli A; Rapis K; Nelki V; Post H; Schmidt G; Alogna A
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():563484. PubMed ID: 33681302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model.
    Frederiksen PH; Linde L; Gregers E; Udesen NLJ; Helgestad OK; Banke A; Dahl JS; Jensen LO; Lassen JF; Povlsen AL; Larsen JP; Schmidt H; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    ESC Heart Fail; 2024 Aug; 11(4):2305-2313. PubMed ID: 38649295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impella CP use in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock.
    Maniuc O; Salinger T; Anders F; Müntze J; Liu D; Hu K; Ertl G; Frantz S; Nordbeck P
    ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Aug; 6(4):863-866. PubMed ID: 31095902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impella as unloading strategy during VA-ECMO: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fiorelli F; Panoulas V
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2021 Dec; 22(4):1503-1511. PubMed ID: 34957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Leads to Heart Rhythm Stabilisation in Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the Dresden Impella Registry.
    Mierke J; Loehn T; Ende G; Jahn S; Quick S; Speiser U; Jellinghaus S; Pfluecke C; Linke A; Ibrahim K
    Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Apr; 30(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 33039280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Undergoing Impella CP Treatment vs. Standard of Care.
    Scherer C; Lüsebrink E; Kupka D; Stocker TJ; Stark K; Stremmel C; Orban M; Petzold T; Germayer A; Mauthe K; Kääb S; Mehilli J; Braun D; Theiss H; Brunner S; Hausleiter J; Massberg S; Orban M
    J Clin Med; 2020 Nov; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 33255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: Choosing the right mechanical circulatory support to improve outcomes.
    Dagher O; Noly PE; Ben Ali W; Bouabdallaoui N; Geicu L; Lamanna R; Malhi P; Romero E; Ducharme A; Demers P; Lamarche Y
    JTCVS Open; 2023 Mar; 13():200-213. PubMed ID: 37063130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Hemodynamic Support by Impella vs. Peripheral Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Nix C; Ishikawa K; Meyns B; Yasuda S; Adriaenssens T; Barth S; Zayat R; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():99. PubMed ID: 32587862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock - Impella support for cardiogenic shock.
    Meyns B; Dens J; Sergeant P; Herijgers P; Daenen W; Flameng W
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 51(6):312-7. PubMed ID: 14669126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impella malrotation affects left ventricle unloading in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Baldetti L; Romagnolo D; Festi M; Beneduce A; Gurrieri D; Peveri B; Frias A; Gramegna M; Sacchi S; Cianfanelli L; Calvo F; Pazzanese V; Chieffo A; Ajello S; Scandroglio AM
    ESC Heart Fail; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39410743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.