218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32785849)
1. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.
Roser C; Hilgenfeld T; Sen S; Badrow T; Zingler S; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1423-1431. PubMed ID: 32785849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic compatibility of various fixed orthodontic retainers for head/neck MRI and dental MRI.
Juerchott A; Roser CJ; Saleem MA; Nittka M; Lux CJ; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):2375-2384. PubMed ID: 36640179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers.
Roser CJ; Hilgenfeld T; Saleem MA; Rückschloß T; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jul; 85(4):279-288. PubMed ID: 36700953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of six different CAD/CAM retainers vs. the stainless steel twistflex retainer: an in vitro investigation of survival rate and stability.
Roser CJ; Bauer C; Hodecker L; Zenthöfer A; Lux CJ; Rues S
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37378840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of CAD/CAM-based fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Bardideh E; Ghorbani M; Shafaee H; Saeedi P; Younessian F
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Sep; 45(5):545-557. PubMed ID: 37471113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial.
Alrawas MB; Kashoura Y; Tosun Ö; Öz U
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential impact of lingual retainers on oral health: comparison between conventional twistflex retainers and CAD/CAM fabricated nitinol retainers : A clinical in vitro and in vivo investigation.
Knaup I; Wagner Y; Wego J; Fritz U; Jäger A; Wolf M
J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Mar; 80(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 30778609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients.
Shim H; Foley P; Bankhead B; Kim KB
Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 34464438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer.
Kravitz ND; Grauer D; Schumacher P; Jo YM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):812-815. PubMed ID: 28364905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of common fixed retainers on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Shalish M; Dykstein N; Friedlander-Barenboim S; Ben-David E; Gomori JM; Chaushu S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):604-9. PubMed ID: 25919106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of CAD/CAM Technology in Interventions Implemented in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.
Ardila CM; Elorza-Durán A; Arrubla-Escobar D
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5310555. PubMed ID: 35692590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: A randomized controlled trial.
Gelin E; Seidel L; Bruwier A; Albert A; Charavet C
Korean J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 50(6):373-382. PubMed ID: 33144526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elemental composition, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers.
Namura Y; Pullisaar H; Holm HV; Syverud M; Mulic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
J Oral Sci; 2024 Apr; 66(2):107-110. PubMed ID: 38403676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study.
Möhlhenrich SC; Jäger F; Jäger A; Schumacher P; Wolf M; Fritz U; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Sep; 79(5):309-319. PubMed ID: 30014179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tooth mobility restriction by multistranded and CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.
Roser CJ; Rues S; Erber R; Hodecker L; Lux CJ; Bauer CAJ
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38086543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Tran G; Rucker R; Foley P; Bankhead B; Adel SM; Kim KB
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38168815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera A; Sankiewicz M; Bilińska M; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38394353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of digital construction, production and intraoral position accuracy of novel 3D CAD/CAM titanium retainers.
Koller S; Craveiro RB; Niederau C; Pollak TL; Knaup I; Wolf M
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Nov; 84(6):384-391. PubMed ID: 35357509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.
Gera A; Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera S; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35964235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
