218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32785849)
21. Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.
Wolf M; Schumacher P; Jäger F; Wego J; Fritz U; Korbmacher-Steiner H; Jäger A; Schauseil M
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25744094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : A prospective short-term study.
Kartal Y; Kaya B; Polat-Özsoy Ö
J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32780168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fixed and removable orthodontic retainers and periodontal health.
Madurantakam P; Kumar S
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):103-104. PubMed ID: 29269822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers.
Çokakoğlu S; Adanur-Atmaca R; Çakır M; Öztürk F
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37786933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Post-treatment Stability in Orthodontic Retention with Twistflex Retainers-Do Patients Benefit from Additional Removable Retainers?
Knaup I; Schulte U; Bartz JR; Niederau C; Craveiro RB; Jäger A; Wolf M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5215-5222. PubMed ID: 35474552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic forces on orthodontic wires in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 tesla.
Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G; Kemper J
J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Nov; 67(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 17124561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note.
Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative study of CAD/CAM fabricated polyether ether ketone and fiber-glass reinforcement composites versus metal lingual retainers under vertical load (an in vitro study).
Alabbadi AA; Abdalla EM; Hanafy SA; Yousry TN
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):583. PubMed ID: 37605187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Precision of the Connection Between Implant and Standard or Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Abutments: A Novel Evaluation Method.
Lops D; Meneghello R; Sbricoli L; Savio G; Bressan E; Stellini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 29340342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Side effects of twistflex retainers-3D evaluation of tooth movement after retainer debonding.
Knaup I; Bartz JR; Schulze-Späte U; Craveiro RB; Kirschneck C; Wolf M
J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Mar; 82(2):121-130. PubMed ID: 33258981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Material-Dependent Implant Artifact Reduction Using SEMAC-VAT and MAVRIC: A Prospective MRI Phantom Study.
Filli L; Jud L; Luechinger R; Nanz D; Andreisek G; Runge VM; Kozerke S; Farshad-Amacker NA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jun; 52(6):381-387. PubMed ID: 28092272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom.
Lee MJ; Janzen DL; Munk PL; MacKay A; Xiang QS; McGowen A
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(7):398-401. PubMed ID: 11499781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Survival of maxillary and mandibular bonded retainers 10 to 15 years after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective observational study.
Kocher KE; Gebistorf MC; Pandis N; Fudalej PS; Katsaros C
Prog Orthod; 2019 Jul; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31328248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of different lingual retainers on periodontal health and stability.
Adanur-Atmaca R; Çokakoğlu S; Öztürk F
Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):468-476. PubMed ID: 33587126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
