These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32785849)
21. CAD/CAM-BASED FIXED LINGUAL ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS MAY BE AS EFFECTIVE AS CONVENTIONAL FIXED RETAINERS. Muhareb LA; Talsania B; Al-Jewair T J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2024 Sep; 24(3):102008. PubMed ID: 39174166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy. Wolf M; Schumacher P; Jäger F; Wego J; Fritz U; Korbmacher-Steiner H; Jäger A; Schauseil M J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25744094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of lingual fixed retainers fabricated using a CAD/CAM bending machine. Cui FP; Park JJ; Kim SH Korean J Orthod; 2024 Jul; 54(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 39048921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study. Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus casei, and Candida Albicans on 5 thermoform and 3D printed orthodontic clear aligner and retainer materials at 3 time points: an in vitro study. Moradinezhad M; Abbasi Montazeri E; Hashemi Ashtiani A; Pourlotfi R; Rakhshan V BMC Oral Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):1107. PubMed ID: 39294648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In Vitro Investigation Using a New Biomechanical Force-Torque Analysis System: Comparison of Conventional and CAD/CAM-Fixed Orthodontic Retainers. Thaden F; Hötzel L; Sabbagh H; Mertmann M; Wichelhaus A Materials (Basel); 2024 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 39410487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : A prospective short-term study. Kartal Y; Kaya B; Polat-Özsoy Ö J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32780168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fixed and removable orthodontic retainers and periodontal health. Madurantakam P; Kumar S Evid Based Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):103-104. PubMed ID: 29269822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers. Çokakoğlu S; Adanur-Atmaca R; Çakır M; Öztürk F Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37786933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic forces on orthodontic wires in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 tesla. Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G; Kemper J J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Nov; 67(6):424-9. PubMed ID: 17124561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies. Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note. Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative study of CAD/CAM fabricated polyether ether ketone and fiber-glass reinforcement composites versus metal lingual retainers under vertical load (an in vitro study). Alabbadi AA; Abdalla EM; Hanafy SA; Yousry TN BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):583. PubMed ID: 37605187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Precision of the Connection Between Implant and Standard or Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Abutments: A Novel Evaluation Method. Lops D; Meneghello R; Sbricoli L; Savio G; Bressan E; Stellini E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 29340342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Side effects of twistflex retainers-3D evaluation of tooth movement after retainer debonding. Knaup I; Bartz JR; Schulze-Späte U; Craveiro RB; Kirschneck C; Wolf M J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Mar; 82(2):121-130. PubMed ID: 33258981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom. Lee MJ; Janzen DL; Munk PL; MacKay A; Xiang QS; McGowen A Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(7):398-401. PubMed ID: 11499781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging. Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]