These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32787315)

  • 1. The Bethe-Salpeter Equation Formalism: From Physics to Chemistry.
    Blase X; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D; Loos PF
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Sep; 11(17):7371-7382. PubMed ID: 32787315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism Accurate for Excitation Energies? Comparisons with TD-DFT, CASPT2, and EOM-CCSD.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2017 Apr; 8(7):1524-1529. PubMed ID: 28301726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spin-Conserved and Spin-Flip Optical Excitations from the Bethe-Salpeter Equation Formalism.
    Monino E; Loos PF
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 May; 17(5):2852-2867. PubMed ID: 33724811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communication: A hybrid Bethe-Salpeter/time-dependent density-functional-theory approach for excitation energies.
    Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Sep; 149(10):101101. PubMed ID: 30219024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining localized orbital scaling correction and Bethe-Salpeter equation for accurate excitation energies.
    Li J; Jin Y; Su NQ; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Apr; 156(15):154101. PubMed ID: 35459294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast and Accurate Electronic Excitations in Cyanines with the Many-Body Bethe-Salpeter Approach.
    Boulanger P; Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Mar; 10(3):1212-8. PubMed ID: 26580191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Energies.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 May; 11(9):3536-3545. PubMed ID: 32298578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of low-lying excitation energies and triplet instabilities of organic molecules with an ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach and the Tamm-Dancoff approximation.
    Rangel T; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2017 May; 146(19):194108. PubMed ID: 28527441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining Renormalized Singles
    Li J; Golze D; Yang W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6637-6645. PubMed ID: 36279250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy Assessment of GW Starting Points for Calculating Molecular Excitation Energies Using the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism.
    Gui X; Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Apr; 14(4):2127-2136. PubMed ID: 29499116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Excitation Energies from the Single-Particle Green's Function with the GW Approximation.
    Jin Y; Yang W
    J Phys Chem A; 2019 Apr; 123(14):3199-3204. PubMed ID: 30920830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Helium Atom Excitations by the GW and Bethe-Salpeter Many-Body Formalism.
    Li J; Holzmann M; Duchemin I; Blase X; Olevano V
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Apr; 118(16):163001. PubMed ID: 28474954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Bethe-Salpeter equation in chemistry: relations with TD-DFT, applications and challenges.
    Blase X; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D
    Chem Soc Rev; 2018 Feb; 47(3):1022-1043. PubMed ID: 29250615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamical correction to the Bethe-Salpeter equation beyond the plasmon-pole approximation.
    Loos PF; Blase X
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Sep; 153(11):114120. PubMed ID: 32962392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An optimally tuned range-separated hybrid starting point for ab initio GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations of molecules.
    McKeon CA; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Aug; 157(7):074103. PubMed ID: 35987597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the
    Hashemi Z; Leppert L
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Mar; 125(10):2163-2172. PubMed ID: 33656894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excited state potential energy surfaces of
    Knysh I; Letellier K; Duchemin I; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Mar; 25(12):8376-8385. PubMed ID: 36883347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Many-body Green's function GW and Bethe-Salpeter study of the optical excitations in a paradigmatic model dipeptide.
    Faber C; Boulanger P; Duchemin I; Attaccalite C; Blase X
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(19):194308. PubMed ID: 24320327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All-Electron BSE@
    Yao Y; Golze D; Rinke P; Blum V; Kanai Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Mar; 18(3):1569-1583. PubMed ID: 35138865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic benchmark of the ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach for low-lying optical excitations of small organic molecules.
    Bruneval F; Hamed SM; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 142(24):244101. PubMed ID: 26133404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.