These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32788484)

  • 21. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements.
    Gorodovsky S; Zidan O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 1501173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention of metal-ceramic crowns with contemporary dental cements.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Zhang H; Wataha JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Sep; 140(9):1125-36. PubMed ID: 19723946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study.
    Duncan JP; Pameijer CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 9791788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention of complete cast coping using four cements.
    Mausner IK; Goldstein GR; Georgescu M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 8667269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.
    Ehlers V; Kampf G; Stender E; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 25794911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
    Song MY; An H; Park EJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
    Pinelli LA; Fais LM; Ricci WA; Reis JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation and comparison of the film thicknesses of six temporary cements before and after thermal cycling.
    Gumus HO; Kurtulus IL; Kuru E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1656-1661. PubMed ID: 30560832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retention of cemented zirconia copings on TiBase abutments.
    Santos-Neto OS; Gonçalves LM; Maia-Filho EM; Malheiros AS; Firoozmand LM; Villis PC; Cardenas AF; Tavarez RR
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Dec; 34(3):214-220. PubMed ID: 35088807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
    Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Bogacki MT; Tietge JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trends in indirect dentistry: 3. Luting materials.
    Burke FJ
    Dent Update; 2005 Jun; 32(5):251-4, 257-8, 260. PubMed ID: 15977720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retentive strength of implant-supported base metal copings over short metal abutments using different luting agents and surface treatments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 24614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.