291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32788623)
1. Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study.
Latorre-Pérez A; Villalba-Bermell P; Pascual J; Vilanova C
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13588. PubMed ID: 32788623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
Chen Z; Grim CJ; Ramachandran P; Meng J
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0011724. PubMed ID: 38687063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs.
Kolmogorov M; Bickhart DM; Behsaz B; Gurevich A; Rayko M; Shin SB; Kuhn K; Yuan J; Polevikov E; Smith TPL; Pevzner PA
Nat Methods; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 33020656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dancing the Nanopore limbo - Nanopore metagenomics from small DNA quantities for bacterial genome reconstruction.
Simon SA; Schmidt K; Griesdorn L; Soares AR; Bornemann TLV; Probst AJ
BMC Genomics; 2023 Dec; 24(1):727. PubMed ID: 38041056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polishing the Oxford Nanopore long-read assemblies of bacterial pathogens with Illumina short reads to improve genomic analyses.
Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
Genomics; 2021 May; 113(3):1366-1377. PubMed ID: 33716184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking genome assembly methods on metagenomic sequencing data.
Zhang Z; Yang C; Veldsman WP; Fang X; Zhang L
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36917471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking Long-Read Assemblers for Genomic Analyses of Bacterial Pathogens Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.
Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 33271875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of strategies for the assembly of diverse bacterial genomes using MinION long-read sequencing.
Goldstein S; Beka L; Graf J; Klassen JL
BMC Genomics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 30626323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultra-deep, long-read nanopore sequencing of mock microbial community standards.
Nicholls SM; Quick JC; Tang S; Loman NJ
Gigascience; 2019 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 31089679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization and simulation of metagenomic nanopore sequencing data with Meta-NanoSim.
Yang C; Lo T; Nip KM; Hafezqorani S; Warren RL; Birol I
Gigascience; 2023 Mar; 12():. PubMed ID: 36939007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of Nanopore polishing tools for microbial genome assembly and polishing strategies for downstream analysis.
Lee JY; Kong M; Oh J; Lim J; Chung SH; Kim JM; Kim JS; Kim KH; Yoo JC; Kwak W
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20740. PubMed ID: 34671046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive investigation of metagenome assembly by linked-read sequencing.
Zhang L; Fang X; Liao H; Zhang Z; Zhou X; Han L; Chen Y; Qiu Q; Li SC
Microbiome; 2020 Nov; 8(1):156. PubMed ID: 33176883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are we there yet? Benchmarking low-coverage nanopore long-read sequencing for the assembling of mitochondrial genomes using the vulnerable silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis.
Baeza JA; García-De León FJ
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):320. PubMed ID: 35459089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes.
Bertrand D; Shaw J; Kalathiyappan M; Ng AHQ; Kumar MS; Li C; Dvornicic M; Soldo JP; Koh JY; Tong C; Ng OT; Barkham T; Young B; Marimuthu K; Chng KR; Sikic M; Nagarajan N
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):937-944. PubMed ID: 31359005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating
Vosloo S; Huo L; Anderson CL; Dai Z; Sevillano M; Pinto A
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0143421. PubMed ID: 34730411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies.
Bouras G; Judd LM; Edwards RA; Vreugde S; Stinear TP; Wick RR
Microb Genom; 2024 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 38833287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating long-read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes: insights and considerations.
Cosma BM; Shirali Hossein Zade R; Jordan EN; van Lent P; Peng C; Pillay S; Abeel T
Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 38000912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction.
Sanderson ND; Kapel N; Rodger G; Webster H; Lipworth S; Street TL; Peto T; Crook D; Stoesser N
Microb Genom; 2023 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36748454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
