These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32788814)

  • 21. Advancing the Bayesian Approach for Multidimensional Polytomous and Nominal IRT Models: Model Formulations and Fit Measures.
    Chen J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 41(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 29881075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. It Might Not Make a Big DIF: Improved Differential Test Functioning Statistics That Account for Sampling Variability.
    Chalmers RP; Counsell A; Flora DB
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Feb; 76(1):114-140. PubMed ID: 29795859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.
    Wang L; Li CS
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):356-78. PubMed ID: 12011504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A whole-genome association analysis of noncompensatory fertility in Holstein bulls.
    Blaschek M; Kaya A; Zwald N; Memili E; Kirkpatrick BW
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4695-9. PubMed ID: 21854943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calibrating the Medical Council of Canada's Qualifying Examination Part I using an integrated item response theory framework: a comparison of models and designs.
    De Champlain AF; Boulais AP; Dallas A
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():6. PubMed ID: 26883811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic Classification Models for Ordinal Item Responses.
    Liu R; Jiang Z
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2512. PubMed ID: 30618941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linear and nonlinear models of patient satisfaction with medical care.
    Neumann L; Neumann Y
    Health Policy; 1984; 4(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 10266573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Multilevel Higher Order Item Response Theory Model for Measuring Latent Growth in Longitudinal Data.
    Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):362-372. PubMed ID: 29881013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Graded Response Model.
    Xiong J; Ding S; Luo F; Luo Z
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3085. PubMed ID: 32038427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring Rubric-Related Multidimensionality in Polytomously Scored Test Items.
    Bolt DM; Adams DJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):163-177. PubMed ID: 29881086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Model Selection for Cogitative Diagnostic Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Test.
    Liu H; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():644764. PubMed ID: 34504454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Principal goals at school: evaluating construct validity and response scaling format.
    Antoniou F; Alghamdi MH
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1283686. PubMed ID: 38356991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Large Sample Confidence Intervals for Item Response Theory Reliability Coefficients.
    Andersson B; Xin T
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Feb; 78(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 29795945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of three polytomous item response theory models in the context of testlet scoring.
    Cook KF; Dodd BG; Fitzpatrick SJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10063769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fitting Item Response Theory Models to Two Personality Inventories: Issues and Insights.
    Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Chan KY; Drasgow F; Williams B
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2001 Oct; 36(4):523-62. PubMed ID: 26822181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias.
    Chalmers RP
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):696-732. PubMed ID: 29907891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Could structural and noncompensatory Lenke 3 and 4C lumbar curves be nonstructural and compensatory? Lenke 1, 2, 3, and 4 curve types were similar and could be considered collectively as a single indication for selective thoracic fusion.
    Chang KW; Chen YY; Wu CM; Leng X; Chen TC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):1850-9. PubMed ID: 25077906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regularized Latent Class Analysis for Polytomous Item Responses: An Application to SPM-LS Data.
    Robitzsch A
    J Intell; 2020 Aug; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 32823949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simple-Structure Multidimensional Item Response Theory Equating for Multidimensional Tests.
    Kim SY; Lee WC; Kolen MJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Feb; 80(1):91-125. PubMed ID: 31933494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.