These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32789312)

  • 21. [The occlusal contact mode during lateral excursion].
    Sugawara N
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Sep; 67(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 11070956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Premolar bracket position revised: proximal and occlusal contacts assessment.
    Eliades T; Gioka C; Papaconstantinou S; Bradley TG
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 15952551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Precision of the virtual occlusal record.
    Botsford KP; Frazier MC; Ghoneima AAM; Utreja A; Bhamidipalli SS; Stewart KT
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Sep; 89(5):751-757. PubMed ID: 30920871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: a comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models.
    Lee H; Cha J; Chun YS; Kim M
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 29921259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Study Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques in the Study of Occlusion.
    Bozhkova T; Musurlieva N; Slavchev D
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():1163874. PubMed ID: 34604379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Static Interocclusal Registration by Three Intraoral Scanner Systems.
    Wong KY; Esguerra RJ; Chia VAP; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29160904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phenomenon of domination of the strongest contacts in centric occlusion.
    Filtchev AD; Kalachev YS
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Mar; 39(3):e99-106. PubMed ID: 18618031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two computerized occlusal analysis systems for indicating occlusal contacts.
    Jeong MY; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 12(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 32377316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability and Validity of T-scan and 3D Intraoral Scanning for Measuring the Occlusal Contact Area.
    Ayuso-Montero R; Mariano-Hernandez Y; Khoury-Ribas L; Rovira-Lastra B; Willaert E; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 31270888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Post-insertion Posterior Single-implant Occlusion Changes at Different Intervals: A T-Scan Computerized Occlusal Analysis.
    Madani AS; Nakhaei M; Alami M; Haghi HR; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):927-932. PubMed ID: 28989132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between non-working-side occlusal contacts and mandibular position.
    Ogawa T; Ogimoto T; Koyano K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Oct; 28(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 11737571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation in normal dentitions.
    McDevitt WE; Warreth AA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):725-34. PubMed ID: 9372462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The investigation of occlusal contacts during the retention period.
    Dinçer M; Meral O; Tümer N
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 14719727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative Study of Occlusal Contact Marking Indicators.
    Bozhkova TP
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Mar; 62(1):180-184. PubMed ID: 32337889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of closure occlusal force parameters in post-orthodontic and non-orthodontic subjects using T-Scan® III DMD occlusal analysis.
    Qadeer S; Yang L; Sarinnaphakorn L; Kerstein RB
    Cranio; 2016 Nov; 34(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 26917279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of occlusal morphology on occlusion time.
    Sierpinska T; Kropiwnicka A; Kuc J; Jacunski P; Gołębiewska M
    Cranio; 2017 Mar; 35(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 27338285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of clenching level on intercuspal contact area in various regions of the dental arch.
    Gurdsapsri W; Ai M; Baba K; Fueki K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 10784336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of occlusal contact area on cusp defection and stress distribution.
    Costa AK; Xavier TA; Paes-Junior TJ; Andreatta-Filho OD; Borges AL
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):699-704. PubMed ID: 25825093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching.
    Kumagai H; Suzuki T; Hamada T; Sondang P; Fujitani M; Nikawa H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Dec; 26(12):932-5. PubMed ID: 10620156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative analytic occlusal study of clinical use of T-scan systems].
    Patyk A; Lotzmann U; Scherer C; Kobes LW
    ZWR; 1989 Sep; 98(9):752-5. PubMed ID: 2700863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.