137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32789587)
1. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomies for esophageal cancer by hospital volume: an analysis of the national cancer database.
Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3802-3810. PubMed ID: 32789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy provides superior surgical resection.
Ali AM; Bachman KC; Worrell SG; Gray KE; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6329-6334. PubMed ID: 33174098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Timing of Robotic Esophagectomy Adoption Impact Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes?
Hue JJ; Bachman KC; Gray KE; Linden PA; Worrell SG; Towe CW
J Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 260():220-228. PubMed ID: 33360305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.
Swisher SG; Deford L; Merriman KW; Walsh GL; Smythe R; Vaporicyan A; Ajani JA; Brown T; Komaki R; Roth JA; Putnam JB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Jun; 119(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 10838528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic Techniques in Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery: An Assessment of Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.
Kamarajah SK; Griffiths EA; Phillips AW; Ruurda J; van Hillegersberg R; Hofstetter WL; Markar SR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2812-2825. PubMed ID: 34890023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.
Ely S; Alabaster A; Ashiku SK; Patel A; Velotta JB
J Thorac Dis; 2019 May; 11(5):1867-1878. PubMed ID: 31285879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continued Relevance of Minimum Volume Standards for Elective Esophagectomy: A National Perspective.
Gandjian M; Williamson C; Sanaiha Y; Hadaya J; Tran Z; Kim ST; Revels S; Benharash P
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 114(2):426-433. PubMed ID: 34437854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Hospital Size on National Trends and Outcomes Following Open Esophagectomy.
Hirji SA; Shah RM; Fields A; Orhurhu V; Bhulani N; White A; Mody GN; Swanson SJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Oct; 55(10):. PubMed ID: 31623325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database.
Yoshida N; Yamamoto H; Baba H; Miyata H; Watanabe M; Toh Y; Matsubara H; Kakeji Y; Seto Y
Ann Surg; 2020 Jul; 272(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 30720501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.
Däster S; Soysal SD; Koechlin L; Stoll L; Peterli R; von Flüe M; Ackermann C
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Sep; 401(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 27436366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with superior survival, lymphadenectomy and surgical margins: propensity matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Worrell SG; Bachman KC; Sarode AL; Perry Y; Linden PA; Towe CW
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Oct; 33(10):. PubMed ID: 32206801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy.
Kuo EY; Chang Y; Wright CD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Oct; 72(4):1118-24. PubMed ID: 11603422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
