These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32789664)

  • 1. Beyond right or wrong: More effective feedback for formative multiple-choice tests.
    Ryan A; Judd T; Swanson D; Larsen DP; Elliott S; Tzanetos K; Kulasegaram K
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 9(5):307-313. PubMed ID: 32789664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the evaluation of formative assessment at two medical faculties with different conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback.
    Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Karay Y; Arias J; Gehlhar K; Zupanic M
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc41. PubMed ID: 32685669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.
    Wagener S; Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Gornostayeva M; Schultz JH; Brüstle P; Mohr D; Vander Beken A; Better J; Fries M; Gottschalk M; Günther J; Herrmann L; Kreisel C; Moczko T; Illg C; Jassowicz A; Müller A; Niesert M; Strübing F; Jünger J
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc46. PubMed ID: 26483859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate detailed feedback to test-enhanced learning: an effective online educational tool.
    Wojcikowski K; Kirk L
    Med Teach; 2013 Nov; 35(11):915-9. PubMed ID: 24003913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
    Butler AC; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Dec; 13(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 18194050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond assessment: feedback for individuals and institutions based on the progress test.
    Coombes L; Ricketts C; Freeman A; Stratford J
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 20515378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback, fairness, and validity: effects of disclosing and reusing multiple-choice questions in medical schools.
    Appelhaus S; Werner S; Grosse P; Kämmer JE
    Med Educ Online; 2023 Dec; 28(1):2143298. PubMed ID: 36350605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training.
    Manzone J; Tremblay L; You-Ten KE; Desai D; Brydges R
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 24606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing a Comprehensive First-year Capstone to Assess and Inform Student Learning and Curriculum Effectiveness.
    Persky AM; Greene JM; Anksorus H; Fuller KA; McLaughlin JE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Jun; 83(5):6730. PubMed ID: 31333250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.
    Ryan A; McColl GJ; O'Brien R; Chiavaroli N; Judd T; Finch S; Swanson D
    Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 51(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 28833428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating Whether Transfer of Learning in Pharmacy Students Depends More on Knowledge Storage or Accessibility.
    Persky AM; Murphy K
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2019 Aug; 83(6):6809. PubMed ID: 31507276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-enhanced learning in medical education.
    Larsen DP; Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 18823514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does providing the correct diagnosis as feedback after self-explanation improve medical students diagnostic performance?
    Chamberland M; Setrakian J; St-Onge C; Bergeron L; Mamede S; Schmidt HG
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):194. PubMed ID: 31185971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Type of Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing on Long-Term Retention.
    Jang Y; Marshall E
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):107-119. PubMed ID: 29547068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Repeated Exposure to Items.
    O'Neill TR; Sun L; Peabody MR; Royal KD
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26507998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Very short answer questions: a viable alternative to multiple choice questions.
    Puthiaparampil T; Rahman MM
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):141. PubMed ID: 32375739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.
    Mostyn A; Meade O; Lymn JS
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Nov; 12():113. PubMed ID: 23148762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.