340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32791393)
1. A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.
Ku D; Koo DH; Bae DS
J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():413-421. PubMed ID: 32791393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closure of skin incision after thyroidectomy through a supraclavicular approach: a comparison between tissue adhesive and staples.
Yang YL; Xiang YY; Jin LP; Pan YF; Zhou SM; Zhang XH; Qu JM
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 24056141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?
Daniilidis K; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ettinger S; Claassen L; Plaass C; Lerch M; Waizy H; Martinelli N; Yao D
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 31055725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
Bron T; Zakine G
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].
Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
Sah AP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aesthetic Comparison of Abdominal Donor Site Scar Between Absorbable Dermal Staple and Subcutaneous Suture after Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled, Double-Blinded Study.
Chung JH; Kim HK; Lee YH; Lee HC; You HJ; Kim DW
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(1):143-150. PubMed ID: 33057829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of aesthetic outcome between tissue adhesive and subcuticular suture in thyroidectomy wound closure in a multiracial country: A randomized controlled trial.
Teoh LY; Chong SS; Hoh SY; Teoh MS; Ng KL
Asian J Surg; 2019 May; 42(5):634-640. PubMed ID: 30446424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Set-back versus buried vertical mattress suturing: results of a randomized blinded trial.
Wang AS; Kleinerman R; Armstrong AW; Fitzmaurice S; Pascucci A; Awasthi S; Ratnarathorn M; Sivamani R; King TH; Eisen DB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 Apr; 72(4):674-80. PubMed ID: 25129615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The absorbable dermal staple device: a faster, more cost-effective method for incisional closure.
Cross KJ; Teo EH; Wong SL; Lambe JS; Rohde CH; Grant RT; Ascherman JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 19568054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
Feese CA; Johnson S; Jones E; Lambers DS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staple versus suture closure for ankle fracture fixation: Retrospective chart review for safety and outcomes.
Lehtonen E; Patel H; Phillips S; Correia Pinto M; Naranje S; Shah A
Foot (Edinb); 2018 Dec; 37():71-76. PubMed ID: 30326415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing.
Ibrahim MI; Moustafa GF; Al-Hamid AS; Hussein MR
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staples equal sutures for skin closure after soft tissue tumor resection.
Moore DC; Sellers MH; Archer KR; Schwartz HS; Holt GE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):899-904. PubMed ID: 22903280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
