These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3279189)

  • 1. Retention of cast endodontic posts: comparison of cementing agents.
    Radke RA; Barkhordar RA; Podesta RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Mar; 59(3):318-20. PubMed ID: 3279189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements.
    Gorodovsky S; Zidan O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 1501173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements.
    Love RM; Purton DG
    J Dent; 1998 Sep; 26(7):599-602. PubMed ID: 9754749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements.
    Chan FW; Harcourt JK; Brockhurst PJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Feb; 38(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8447770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements.
    Mendoza DB; Eakle WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 7853255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of various cementation methods on the retention of prefabricated posts.
    Tjan AH; Tjan AH; Greive JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 3305896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of the retentive capacity of dental cementing agents.
    Omar R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jul; 60(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 3042980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive characteristics of dental cementation materials.
    Hunsaker KJ; Christensen GJ; Christensen RP; Cao D; Lewis RG
    Gen Dent; 1993 Nov; 41 Spec No():464-7. PubMed ID: 23087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M; Lippenberger S; Rues S; Gilde H; Rammelsberg P
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load transfer of posts and cores to roots through cements.
    Leary JM; Jensen ME; Sheth JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Sep; 62(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 2509685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Salama M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 9051596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of luting agents with composite resin cores.
    Moody CR; DeWald JP; Ferracane JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):527-9. PubMed ID: 2691656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of bonding systems for the polycarbonate crown restoration.
    Wiggins CE; Caputo AA; Jedrychowski JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1978 May; 96(5):823-6. PubMed ID: 348742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.