These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32791996)

  • 1. Nadir CA-125 serum levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and no residual tumor at interval debulking surgery predict prognosis in advanced stage ovarian cancer.
    Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nishimura T; Yamashita S; Kigure K; Ito I; Kanuma T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):200. PubMed ID: 32791996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Analysis of factors related to the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer].
    Wang DF; Zhang GN; Peng CR; Shi Y; Shi XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):385-392. PubMed ID: 34154313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer, SGOG SUNNY (SOC-2) trial concept.
    Jiang R; Zhu J; Kim JW; Liu J; Kato K; Kim HS; Zhang Y; Zhang P; Zhu T; Aoki D; Yu A; Chen X; Wang X; Zhu D; Zhang W; Jia H; Shi T; Gao W; Yin S; Feng Y; Xiang L; Okamoto A; Zang R
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 31(5):e86. PubMed ID: 32808504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.
    Kobal B; Noventa M; Cvjeticanin B; Barbic M; Meglic L; Herzog M; Bordi G; Vitagliano A; Saccardi C; Skof E
    Radiol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):307-319. PubMed ID: 30210049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection.
    Gill SE; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Cliby WA; Langstraat CL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):266-273. PubMed ID: 27916269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on platinum resistance in stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Luo Y; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Song YS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(36):e4797. PubMed ID: 27603388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of HE4 in advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Analysis of HE4 kinetics during NACT, predicting surgical outcome and recurrence in comparison to CA125.
    AlSomairi A; Himayda S; Altelmesani A; Lee YJ; Lee JY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 181():155-161. PubMed ID: 38176127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.
    Bryant A; Hiu S; Kunonga PT; Gajjar K; Craig D; Vale L; Winter-Roach BA; Elattar A; Naik R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 9(9):CD015048. PubMed ID: 36161421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary surgery or interval debulking for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: does it matter?
    Markauskas A; Mogensen O; dePont Christensen R; Jensen PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25180461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing the right timing for interval debulking surgery and perioperative chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.
    Wang D; Zhang G; Peng C; Shi Y; Shi X
    J Ovarian Res; 2021 Mar; 14(1):49. PubMed ID: 33771198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative Predictive Factors for Complete Cytoreduction and Survival Outcome in Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Baek MH; Lee SW; Park JY; Rhim CC; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Mar; 27(3):420-429. PubMed ID: 28187098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Rodriguez N; Rauh-Hain JA; Shoni M; Berkowitz RS; Muto MG; Feltmate C; Schorge JO; Del Carmen MG; Matulonis UA; Horowitz NS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 May; 125(2):362-6. PubMed ID: 22333992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in FIGO IIIC and IV patients; results from a survey study in the Netherlands.
    Timmermans M; Sonke GS; van Driel WJ; Lalisang RI; Ottevanger PB; de Kroon CD; Van de Vijver KK; van der Aa MA; Kruitwagen RF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Apr; 223():98-102. PubMed ID: 29525755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To compare the optimal cytoreduction rate in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer stage III/IV after 3 versus 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Kumari A; Thakur M; Saha SC; Suri V; Prasad GRV; Patel FD; Radhika S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):616-620. PubMed ID: 32811236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study.
    Gao Y; Li Y; Zhang C; Han J; Liang H; Zhang K; Guo H
    J Ovarian Res; 2019 Sep; 12(1):85. PubMed ID: 31519183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience.
    Ghisoni E; Katsaros D; Maggiorotto F; Aglietta M; Vaira M; De Simone M; Mittica G; Giannone G; Robella M; Genta S; Lucchino F; Marocco F; Borella F; Valabrega G; Ponzone R
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 May; 11(1):42. PubMed ID: 29843747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Serum CA125 levels predict outcome of interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
    Zhang D; Jiang YX; Luo SJ; Zhou R; Jiang QX; Linghu H
    Clin Chim Acta; 2018 Sep; 484():32-35. PubMed ID: 29702068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Laparotomy with Robot-assisted Interval Debulking Surgery for Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Zhang Y; Grant MS; Zhang X; Paraghamian SE; Tan X; Clark LH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1237-1243. PubMed ID: 33248314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multivariate analysis of the prognostic impact of tumor burden, surgical timing and complexity after complete cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer.
    Angeles MA; Rychlik A; Cabarrou B; Spagnolo E; Guyon F; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A; Siegrist J; Querleu D; Mery E; Gladieff L; Hernández A; Ferron G; Martinez A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):614-621. PubMed ID: 32709536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
    Bian C; Yao K; Li L; Yi T; Zhao X
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 293(1):163-168. PubMed ID: 26198168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.