217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32791998)
1. Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Lian Z; Zhang H; He Z; Ma S; Wang X; Liu R
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 32791998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perineural Invasion and Lymphovascular Invasion are Associated with Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Kang M; Oh JJ; Lee S; Hong SK; Lee SE; Byun SS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):2699-706. PubMed ID: 26965702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Length of site-specific positive surgical margins as a risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hsu M; Chang SL; Ferrari M; Nolley R; Presti JC; Brooks JD
Int J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21342296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of perineural invasion focus after radical prostatectomy could improve predictive power of recurrence.
Wu S; Xie L; Lin SX; Wirth GJ; Lu M; Zhang Y; Blute ML; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():96-104. PubMed ID: 32673683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Focal nodular enhancement on DCE MRI of the prostatectomy bed: radiologic-pathologic correlations and prognostic value.
Park MY; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2985-2994. PubMed ID: 36350389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Ristau BT; Tomaszewski JJ; Chen YF; Bertolet M; Woldemichael E; Nelson JB
World J Urol; 2015 Sep; 33(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 25366883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location.
Pettus JA; Weight CJ; Thompson CJ; Middleton RG; Stephenson RA
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 15201752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
