188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32792539)
21. Reproducible fixation with a tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty at 8-15 years follow-up.
Rodriguez JA; Deshmukh AJ; Robinson J; Cornell CN; Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat AS; Ranawat CS
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9 Suppl):214-8. PubMed ID: 24994705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tapered, fluted titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: role and results in contemporary practice.
Sandiford NA; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Masri BA
Instr Course Lect; 2015; 64():359-66. PubMed ID: 25745920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Sun L; Song W; Zhang Z; Xu Z; Sun M; Gao G; Jiang H; Ju C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jul; 24(1):567. PubMed ID: 37434207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Risk factors for subsidence of modular fluted tapered stem implanted by using transfemoral Wagner approach during revision hip arthroplasty.
Bobovec D; Bohaček I; Juras J; Delimar D
Int Orthop; 2020 Sep; 44(9):1685-1691. PubMed ID: 32405886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using Wagner SL revision stem in femoral intertrochanteric fractures for patients with old fracture or painful arthritis before injury].
Chen XW; Ye RQ; Xu HP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Mar; 30(3):264-269. PubMed ID: 29349968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem.
Carlson SW; Goetz DD; Liu SS; Greiner JJ; Callaghan JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-6. PubMed ID: 27339824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. No Difference in Subsidence Between Modern Monoblock and Modular Titanium Fluted Tapered Femoral Stems.
Pomeroy E; Lim JBT; Vasarhelyi EM; Naudie DDR; Lanting B; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW; Howard JL
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S223-S228. PubMed ID: 36963526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Femoral revision in periprosthetic fractures using a titanium modular fluted tapered stem: mortality and clinical and radiological outcomes.
Munegato D; Caminita AD; Sotiri R; Rossi A; Bigoni M; Zatti G
Hip Int; 2020 Dec; 30(2_suppl):101-107. PubMed ID: 33267693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Moriarty P; Sheridan GA; Wong L; Guerin S; Gul R; Harty JA
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Aug; 35(8):2195-2199. PubMed ID: 32327285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role and results of tapered fluted modular titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Munro JT; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):58-60. PubMed ID: 23118383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Revision hip arthroplasty with a rectangular tapered cementless stem: a retrospective study of the SLR-Plus stem at a mean follow-up of 4.1 years.
Uriarte I; Moreta J; Cortés L; Bernuy L; Aguirre U; Martínez de Los Mozos JL
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 31617019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review.
Koutalos AA; Varitimidis S; Malizos KN; Karachalios T
Hip Int; 2022 Jul; 32(4):475-487. PubMed ID: 33829900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical, radiographic, and survivorship analysis of a modular fluted tapered stem in revision hip arthroplasty.
Picado CHF; Savarese A; Cardamoni VDS; Sugo AT; Garcia FL
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(1):2309499019891638. PubMed ID: 31833457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement.
Fink B; Urbansky K; Schuster P
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jul; 96-B(7):889-95. PubMed ID: 24986941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence.
Yacovelli S; Ottaway J; Banerjee S; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32863074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup.
Van Houwelingen AP; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Feb; 471(2):454-62. PubMed ID: 22948527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Midterm results of titanium conical Wagner stem with challenging femoral anatomy: Survivorship and unique bone remodeling.
Shahin M; Massé V; Belzile É; Bédard L; Angers M; Vendittoli PA
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 109(1):103242. PubMed ID: 35158103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patterns of osseointegration and remodeling in femoral revision with bone loss using modular, tapered, fluted, titanium stems.
Rodriguez JA; Deshmukh AJ; Klauser WU; Rasquinha VJ; Lubinus P; Ranawat CS
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1409-17.e1. PubMed ID: 21855273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs.
Richards CJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):491-6. PubMed ID: 19847578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
