These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32793016)

  • 1. Item Features Interact With Item Category in Their Influence on Preferences.
    Oren S; Sela T; Levy DJ; Schonberg T
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():988. PubMed ID: 32793016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of item placement on snack food choices from physical and online menus.
    Gynell I; Kemps E; Prichard I; Tiggemann M
    Appetite; 2022 Feb; 169():105792. PubMed ID: 34742773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory for individual items is related to nonreinforced preference change.
    Botvinik-Nezer R; Bakkour A; Salomon T; Shohamy D; Schonberg T
    Learn Mem; 2021 Oct; 28(10):348-360. PubMed ID: 34526380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monkeys exhibit human-like gaze biases in economic decisions.
    Lupkin SM; McGinty VB
    Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37497784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanisms of Choice Behavior Shift Using Cue-approach Training.
    Bakkour A; Leuker C; Hover AM; Giles N; Poldrack RA; Schonberg T
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():421. PubMed ID: 27047435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Child and adult snack food intake in response to manipulated pre-packaged snack item quantity/variety and snack box size: a population-based randomized trial.
    Kerr JA; Jansen PW; Mensah FK; Gibbons K; Olds TS; Carlin JB; Clifford SA; Burgner D; Gold L; Baur LA; Wake M
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2019 Oct; 43(10):1891-1902. PubMed ID: 31320694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which snack factors and nutritional ingredients influence college students' snack choices? Evidence from discrete choice experiments.
    Rusmevichientong P; Jaynes J; Kazemi S
    J Am Coll Health; 2020; 68(2):192-199. PubMed ID: 30614765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prompting consumers to make healthier food choices in hospitals: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Allan JL; Powell DJ
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Jul; 17(1):86. PubMed ID: 32631366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aesthetic preference for art can be predicted from a mixture of low- and high-level visual features.
    Iigaya K; Yi S; Wahle IA; Tanwisuth K; O'Doherty JP
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 5(6):743-755. PubMed ID: 34017097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does odour priming influence snack choice? - An eye-tracking study to understand food choice processes.
    Morquecho-Campos P; Hellmich IM; Zwart E; de Graaf K; Boesveldt S
    Appetite; 2022 Jan; 168():105772. PubMed ID: 34715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image Feature Types and Their Predictions of Aesthetic Preference and Naturalness.
    Ibarra FF; Kardan O; Hunter MR; Kotabe HP; Meyer FAC; Berman MG
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():632. PubMed ID: 28503158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Promoting subjective preferences in simple economic choices during nap.
    Ai S; Yin Y; Chen Y; Wang C; Sun Y; Tang X; Lu L; Zhu L; Shi J
    Elife; 2018 Dec; 7():. PubMed ID: 30520732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution.
    Dreyer NA; Velentgas P; Westrich K; Dubois R
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2014 Mar; 20(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24564810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item.
    Elwyn G; Tsulukidze M; Edwards A; Légaré F; Newcombe R
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Nov; 93(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 24029581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a preference-based index from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25.
    Rentz AM; Kowalski JW; Walt JG; Hays RD; Brazier JE; Yu R; Lee P; Bressler N; Revicki DA
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 24435696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Children's purchase behavior in the snack market: Can branding or lower prices motivate healthier choices?
    Hartmann M; Cash SB; Yeh CH; Landwehr SC; McAlister AR
    Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():247-254. PubMed ID: 28625855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.