202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32794272)
1. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.
Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.
Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.
Del Corso G; Verzicco R; Viola F
J R Soc Interface; 2020 Oct; 17(171):20200532. PubMed ID: 33109017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainty in cardiac myofiber orientation and stiffnesses dominate the variability of left ventricle deformation response.
Rodríguez-Cantano R; Sundnes J; Rognes ME
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 35(5):e3178. PubMed ID: 30632711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applicability of the polynomial chaos expansion method for personalization of a cardiovascular pulse wave propagation model.
Huberts W; Donders WP; Delhaas T; van de Vosse FN
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Dec; 30(12):1679-704. PubMed ID: 25377937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Metamodeling Approach for Instant Severity Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification of Iliac Artery Stenoses.
Heinen SGH; Gashi K; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPPM; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2020 Jan; 142(1):. PubMed ID: 31513713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generalized polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and propagation in multi-scale modeling of cardiac electrophysiology.
Hu Z; Du D; Du Y
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():57-74. PubMed ID: 30248513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncertainty quantification for ecological models with random parameters.
Reimer JR; Adler FR; Golden KM; Narayan A
Ecol Lett; 2022 Oct; 25(10):2232-2244. PubMed ID: 36068942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using UncertainSCI to Quantify Uncertainty in Cardiac Simulations.
Rupp LC; Liu Z; Bergquist JA; Rampersad S; White D; Tate JD; Brooks DH; Narayan A; MacLeod RS
Comput Cardiol (2010); 2020 Sep; 47():. PubMed ID: 36845870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics.
Schäfer F; Schiavazzi DE; Hellevik LR; Sturdy J
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2024 Jun; ():e3836. PubMed ID: 38837871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personalization of models with many model parameters: an efficient sensitivity analysis approach.
Donders WP; Huberts W; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 26017545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainpy: A Python Toolbox for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis in Computational Neuroscience.
Tennøe S; Halnes G; Einevoll GT
Front Neuroinform; 2018; 12():49. PubMed ID: 30154710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.
Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration of biomechanical models with isotropic material behavior.
Römer U; Liu J; Böl M
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 38(4):e3575. PubMed ID: 35094499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme.
Biehler J; Gee MW; Wall WA
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jun; 14(3):489-513. PubMed ID: 25245816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust motion trajectory optimization of overhead cranes based on polynomial chaos expansion.
Peng H; Zhao H; Wang X; Li Y
ISA Trans; 2021 Apr; 110():71-85. PubMed ID: 33745509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiscale Model for In-Stent Restenosis.
Nikishova A; Veen L; Zun P; Hoekstra AG
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):761-774. PubMed ID: 30136082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty quantification implementations in human hemodynamic flows.
Ninos G; Bartzis V; Merlemis N; Sarris IE
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 May; 203():106021. PubMed ID: 33721602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propagation of parametric uncertainty for the K+ channel model in mouse ventricular myocytes.
Yuncheng Du ; Dongping Du
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5587-5590. PubMed ID: 28269521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
