149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32794395)
1. Effect of biofilm exposure on marginal integrity of composite restorations.
Mushashe AM; de Almeida SA; Ferracane JL; Merritt J; Correr GM
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):201-205. PubMed ID: 32794395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biofilm formation affects surface properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.
Hyun HK; Salehi S; Ferracane JL
Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1599-608. PubMed ID: 26590029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps.
Khvostenko D; Salehi S; Naleway SE; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25900624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of biofilm formation on the optical properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.
Hyun HK; Ferracane JL
Dent Mater; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1144-51. PubMed ID: 27394086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations.
de Assis FS; Lima SN; Tonetto MR; Bhandi SH; Pinto SC; Malaquias P; Loguercio AD; Bandéca MC
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 27419244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations.
Pinna R; Usai P; Filigheddu E; Garcia-Godoy F; Milia E
Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):285-292. PubMed ID: 29178733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved marginal adaptation of composite restorations by using different placement and light polymerization techniques.
Ramic BD; Premovic MT; Stojanac IL; Drobac MR; Petrovic LM
Am J Dent; 2018 Feb; 31(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29630798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dye staining gap test: an alternative method for assessing marginal gap formation in composite restorations.
Caroline Bruschi Alonso R; Maria Correr G; Gonçalves Cunha L; Flávia Sanches Borges A; Maria Puppin-Rontani R; Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Jun; 64(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 16809190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal characteristics of different filling materials and filling methods with standardized cavity preparation.
Stoll R; Remes H; Kunzelmann KH; Stachniss V
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11317400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations.
Thonemann BM; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
Dent Mater; 1997 May; 13(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9758974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
