221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32795723)
1. EView: An electric field visualization web platform for electroporation-based therapies.
Perera-Bel E; Yagüe C; Mercadal B; Ceresa M; Beitel-White N; Davalos RV; Ballester MAG; Ivorra A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105682. PubMed ID: 32795723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Educational application for visualization and analysis of electric field strength in multiple electrode electroporation.
Mahnič-Kalamiza S; Kotnik T; Miklavčič D
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 12():102. PubMed ID: 23107609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation.
Corovic S; Lackovic I; Sustaric P; Sustar T; Rodic T; Miklavcic D
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Feb; 12():16. PubMed ID: 23433433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytical and numerical quantification and comparison of the local electric field in the tissue for different electrode configurations.
Corović S; Pavlin M; Miklavcic D
Biomed Eng Online; 2007 Oct; 6():37. PubMed ID: 17937793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An e-learning application on electrochemotherapy.
Corovic S; Bester J; Miklavcic D
Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Oct; 8():26. PubMed ID: 19843322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PIRET-A Platform for Treatment Planning in Electroporation-Based Therapies.
Perera-Bel E; Aycock KN; Salameh ZS; Gomez-Barea M; Davalos RV; Ivorra A; Ballester MAG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 70(6):1902-1910. PubMed ID: 37015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electroporation of the Liver: More Than 2 Concurrently Active, Curved Electrodes Allow New Concepts for Irreversible Electroporation and Electrochemotherapy.
Ritter A; Bruners P; Isfort P; Barabasch A; Pfeffer J; Schmitz J; Pedersoli F; Baumann M
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818809994. PubMed ID: 30411673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the effect of electrode orientation on irreversible electroporation with experiment and simulation.
Wardhana G; Raman NM; Abayazid M; Fütterer JJ
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(8):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 35451675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time-Dependent Finite Element Analysis of In Vivo Electrochemotherapy Treatment.
Pintar M; Langus J; Edhemović I; Brecelj E; Kranjc M; Sersa G; Šuštar T; Rodič T; Miklavčič D; Kotnik T; Kos B
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818790510. PubMed ID: 30089424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of safety for electrochemotherapy and irreversible electroporation ablation therapies in patients with cardiac pacemakers.
Jarm T; Krmac T; Magjarevic R; Kos B; Cindric H; Miklavcic D
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Nov; 19(1):85. PubMed ID: 33198769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of conductive gels for electric field homogenization increases the antitumor efficacy of electroporation therapies.
Ivorra A; Al-Sakere B; Rubinsky B; Mir LM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6605-18. PubMed ID: 18978447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards electroporation based treatment planning considering electric field induced muscle contractions.
Golberg A; Rubinsky B
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 11(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 22335414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrochemotherapy Effectiveness Loss due to Electric Field Indentation between Needle Electrodes: A Numerical Study.
Berkenbrock JA; Machado RG; Suzuki DOH
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():6024635. PubMed ID: 30057732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Electrode Distance in Grid Electrode: Numerical Models and In Vitro Tests.
Ongaro A; Campana LG; De Mattei M; Di Barba P; Dughiero F; Forzan M; Mognaschi ME; Pellati A; Rossi CR; Bernardello C; Sieni E
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818764498. PubMed ID: 29558871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrode commutation sequence for honeycomb arrangement of electrodes in electrochemotherapy and corresponding electric field distribution.
Rebersek M; Corović S; Sersa G; Miklavcic D
Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18424240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic finite-element model for efficient modelling of electric currents in electroporated tissue.
Langus J; Kranjc M; Kos B; Šuštar T; Miklavčič D
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26409. PubMed ID: 27211822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of employing model-based optimization of pulse amplitude and electrode distance for effective tumor electropermeabilization.
Sel D; Lebar AM; Miklavcic D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 17518273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues.
Miklavcic D; Beravs K; Semrov D; Cemazar M; Demsar F; Sersa G
Biophys J; 1998 May; 74(5):2152-8. PubMed ID: 9591642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of multi-electrode implant configurations and programming for the delivery of non-ablative electric fields in intratumoral modulation therapy.
Iredale E; Deweyert A; Hoover DA; Chen JZ; Schmid S; Hebb MO; Peters TM; Wong E
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5441-5454. PubMed ID: 32978963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electroporation-based treatment planning for deep-seated tumors based on automatic liver segmentation of MRI images.
Pavliha D; Mušič MM; Serša G; Miklavčič D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e69068. PubMed ID: 23936315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
