These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32795932)

  • 21. [Manual facial reconstruction in forensic medicine].
    Vermeulen L
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 16370438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Body height estimation from head and face dimensions: a different method.
    Pelin C; Zağyapan R; Yazici C; Kürkçüoğlu A
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1326-30. PubMed ID: 20487169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Craniofacial reconstruction using a combined statistical model of face shape and soft tissue depths: methodology and validation.
    Claes P; Vandermeulen D; De Greef S; Willems G; Suetens P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S147-58. PubMed ID: 16540276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variation in soft-tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions.
    Simpson E; Henneberg M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 Jun; 118(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 12012365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing regression and mean model approaches to facial soft-tissue thickness estimation.
    Houlton TM; Jooste N; Steyn M
    Med Sci Law; 2021 Jul; 61(3):170-179. PubMed ID: 33251942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative analysis of four morphometric methods for sex estimation: A study conducted on human skulls.
    Sinhorini PA; Costa IAP; Lopez-Capp TT; Biazevic MGH; de Paiva LAS
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Jul; 39():29-34. PubMed ID: 31200148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Building faces from dry skulls: are they recognized above chance rates?
    Stephan CN; Henneberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 11372979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anthropological facial approximation in three dimensions (AFA3D): computer-assisted estimation of the facial morphology using geometric morphometrics.
    Guyomarc'h P; Dutailly B; Charton J; Santos F; Desbarats P; Coqueugniot H
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1502-16. PubMed ID: 25088006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial Pattern I, II and III.
    Thiesen G; Pletsch G; Zastrow MD; do Valle CV; do Valle-Corotti KM; Patel MP; Conti PC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23876952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mouth width prediction in craniofacial identification: cadaver tests of four recent methods, including two techniques for edentulous skulls.
    Stephan CN; Murphy SJ
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun; 26(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 22689350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey.
    Aulsebrook WA; Işcan MY; Slabbert JH; Becker P
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Oct; 75(2-3):101-20. PubMed ID: 8586334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel skull registration based on global and local deformations for craniofacial reconstruction.
    Deng Q; Zhou M; Shui W; Wu Z; Ji Y; Bai R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):95-102. PubMed ID: 21185136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Morphological integration of mandible and cranium: orthodontic implications.
    Alarcón JA; Bastir M; García-Espona I; Menéndez-Núñez M; Rosas A
    Arch Oral Biol; 2014 Jan; 59(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24192112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of anatomical consistency in craniofacial superimposition images.
    Yoshino M; Imaizumi K; Miyasaka S; Seta S
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Jun; 74(1-2):125-34. PubMed ID: 7665126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Craniofacial Reconstruction Method Based on Region Fusion Strategy.
    Wen Y; Mingquan Z; Pengyue L; Guohua G; Xiaoning L; Kang L
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8835179. PubMed ID: 33490260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of stature by cephalometric facial dimensions in skeletonized bodies: study from a sample modern Colombians skeletal remains.
    González-Colmenares G; Medina CS; Báez LC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jan; 258():101.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26631845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of stature from cephalo-facial dimensions by regression analysis in Indo-Mauritian population.
    Agnihotri AK; Kachhwaha S; Googoolye K; Allock A
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2011 May; 18(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 21550566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photo-Realistic Statistical Skull Morphotypes: New Exemplars for Ancestry and Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology.
    Caple J; Stephan CN
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):562-572. PubMed ID: 27907240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mandibular shape prediction using cephalometric analysis: applications in craniofacial analysis, forensic anthropology and archaeological reconstruction.
    Omran A; Wertheim D; Smith K; Liu CYJ; Naini FB
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Oct; 42(1):37. PubMed ID: 33296053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.