BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

852 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32796451)

  • 1. Is there a utility of adding skeletal imaging to 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography in initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer?
    Raju S; Sharma A; Patel C; Sahoo R; Das CJ; Kumar S; Sharma A; Kumar R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Nov; 41(11):1183-1188. PubMed ID: 32796451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Total-Body
    Pomykala KL; Czernin J; Grogan TR; Armstrong WR; Williams J; Calais J
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):405-411. PubMed ID: 31541035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
    Schmidkonz C; Cordes M; Goetz TI; Prante O; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Uder M; Wullich B; Goebell P; Bäuerle T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):766-775. PubMed ID: 31338731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of [
    Uprimny C; Svirydenka A; Fritz J; Kroiss AS; Nilica B; Decristoforo C; Haubner R; von Guggenberg E; Buxbaum S; Horninger W; Virgolini IJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1873-1883. PubMed ID: 29766246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of 68Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT in the pretreatment staging of primary prostate cancer.
    Meyrick DP; Asokendaran M; Skelly LA; Lenzo NP; Henderson A
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):956-963. PubMed ID: 28922335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
    Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Farolfi A; Fonti C; Lodi F; Fanti S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 30350010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11.
    Uprimny C; Kroiss AS; Decristoforo C; Fritz J; von Guggenberg E; Kendler D; Scarpa L; di Santo G; Roig LG; Maffey-Steffan J; Horninger W; Virgolini IJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 44(6):941-949. PubMed ID: 28138747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in initial staging of patients with prostate cancer and importance of intraprostatic SUVmax values.
    Rogic I; Golubic AT; Zuvic M; Smitran T; Jukic N; Gamulin M; Kastelan Z; Huic D
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2024; 27(0):6-12. PubMed ID: 38680016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Klingenberg S; Jochumsen MR; Ulhøi BP; Fredsøe J; Sørensen KD; Borre M; Bouchelouche K
    J Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 62(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 32444374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Head-to-Head Comparison of
    Kuten J; Fahoum I; Savin Z; Shamni O; Gitstein G; Hershkovitz D; Mabjeesh NJ; Yossepowitch O; Mishani E; Even-Sapir E
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 61(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 31562225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    Hruby G; Eade T; Emmett L; Ho B; Hsiao E; Schembri G; Guo L; Kwong C; Hunter J; Byrne K; Kneebone A
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 29663686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of
    Regula N; Kostaras V; Johansson S; Trampal C; Lindström E; Lubberink M; Velikyan I; Sörensen J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4993. PubMed ID: 32193430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial of
    McCarthy M; Francis R; Tang C; Watts J; Campbell A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 30890448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of
    Schwenck J; Rempp H; Reischl G; Kruck S; Stenzl A; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; la Fougère C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 27557844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for staging of high-risk prostate cancer68Ga-PSMA PET and MRI in prostate cancer.
    Tulsyan S; Das CJ; Tripathi M; Seth A; Kumar R; Bal C
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1094-1102. PubMed ID: 28957842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective comparison of
    Zacho HD; Nielsen JB; Afshar-Oromieh A; Haberkorn U; deSouza N; De Paepe K; Dettmann K; Langkilde NC; Haarmark C; Fisker RV; Arp DT; Carl J; Jensen JB; Petersen LJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Oct; 45(11):1884-1897. PubMed ID: 29876619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.