289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32796465)
1. Single-level Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Alone and Posterior Interbody Fusion (PLIF/TLIF) Alone Lead to a Decreased Risk of Short-term Complications Compared to Combined PLF With PLIF/TLIF Procedures: A Matched Analysis.
Plantz MA; Hsu WK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):E1391-E1399. PubMed ID: 32796465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion.
Lee JC; Kim Y; Soh JW; Shin BJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E339-45. PubMed ID: 24365899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Liu J; Deng H; Long X; Chen X; Xu R; Liu Z
Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 26126415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine.
Kim KT; Lee SH; Lee YH; Bae SC; Suk KS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1351-7; discussion 1358. PubMed ID: 16721298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity.
Mehta VA; McGirt MJ; Garcés Ambrossi GL; Parker SL; Sciubba DM; Bydon A; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Witham TF
Neurol Res; 2011 Jan; 33(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 20546682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine.
Audat Z; Moutasem O; Yousef K; Mohammad B
Singapore Med J; 2012 Mar; 53(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 22434292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.
Hofstetter CP; Hofer AS; Levi AD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):457-75. PubMed ID: 26613283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.
Kobayashi K; Ando K; Kato F; Kanemura T; Sato K; Hachiya Y; Matsubara Y; Kamiya M; Sakai Y; Yagi H; Shinjo R; Nishida Y; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
Eur Spine J; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1972-1980. PubMed ID: 29423887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Systematic Review of Lumbar Fusion Rates With and Without the Use of rhBMP-2.
Galimberti F; Lubelski D; Healy AT; Wang T; Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(14):1132-9. PubMed ID: 25955186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
