These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32797083)

  • 41. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population.
    Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency.
    Tenan S; Pedrini P; Bragalanti N; Groff C; Sutherland C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185588. PubMed ID: 28973034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Stevenson BC; Fewster RM; Sharma K
    Biometrics; 2022 Sep; 78(3):963-973. PubMed ID: 34051114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Toward reliable population estimates of wolves by combining spatial capture-recapture models and non-invasive DNA monitoring.
    López-Bao JV; Godinho R; Pacheco C; Lema FJ; García E; Llaneza L; Palacios V; Jiménez J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2177. PubMed ID: 29391588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing bias in demographic estimates from joint live and dead encounter models.
    Weegman MD; Wilson S; Alisauskas RT; Kellett DK
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9382. PubMed ID: 32612891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A flexible and efficient Bayesian implementation of point process models for spatial capture-recapture data.
    Zhang W; Chipperfield JD; Illian JB; Dupont P; Milleret C; de Valpine P; Bischof R
    Ecology; 2023 Jan; 104(1):e3887. PubMed ID: 36217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. State space and movement specification in open population spatial capture-recapture models.
    Gardner B; Sollmann R; Kumar NS; Jathanna D; Karanth KU
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Oct; 8(20):10336-10344. PubMed ID: 30397470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A spatial open-population capture-recapture model.
    Efford MG; Schofield MR
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 31517386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches.
    Efford MG
    Ecology; 2011 Dec; 92(12):2202-7. PubMed ID: 22352159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessing small-mammal trapping design using spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) modeling on long-term monitoring data.
    Freeman CM; Barthman-Thompson L; Klinger R; Woo I; Thorne KM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270082. PubMed ID: 35788575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Estimating the size of an open population using sparse capture-recapture data.
    Huggins R; Stoklosa J; Roach C; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):280-288. PubMed ID: 28632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Estimation of pack density in grey wolf (
    Mattioli L; Canu A; Passilongo D; Scandura M; Apollonio M
    Front Zool; 2018; 15():38. PubMed ID: 30305834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal.
    Jůnek T; Jůnková Vymyslická P; Hozdecká K; Hejcmanová P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136525. PubMed ID: 26334997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spatial capture-recapture with random thinning for unidentified encounters.
    Jiménez J; C Augustine B; Linden DW; B Chandler R; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(3):1187-1198. PubMed ID: 33598123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.
    Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reliability of different mark-recapture methods for population size estimation tested against reference population sizes constructed from field data.
    Grimm A; Gruber B; Henle K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98840. PubMed ID: 24896260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. On the design of closed recapture experiments.
    Alunni Fegatelli D; Farcomeni A
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1273-1294. PubMed ID: 27336415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Capture-Recapture Estimators in Epidemiology with Applications to Pertussis and Pneumococcal Invasive Disease Surveillance.
    Braeye T; Verheagen J; Mignon A; Flipse W; Pierard D; Huygen K; Schirvel C; Hens N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159832. PubMed ID: 27529167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.