175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32798182)
1. Micromotion Analysis of Various Tibial Constructs in Moderate Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Alipit V; Kirk A; Scholl D; Schmidig G; Springer BD; Lee GC
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):362-367.e1. PubMed ID: 32798182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metaphyseal Stem Extension Improves Tibial Stability in Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Morwood MP; Guss AD; Law JI; Pelt CE
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Oct; 35(10):3031-3037. PubMed ID: 32600812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility.
Nadorf J; Kinkel S; Gantz S; Jakubowitz E; Kretzer JP
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177285. PubMed ID: 28481956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Anterior Spike Decreases Bone-Implant Micromotion in Cementless Tibial Baseplates for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study.
Quevedo Gonzalez FJ; Lipman JD; Sculco PK; Sculco TP; De Martino I; Wright TM
J Arthroplasty; 2024 May; 39(5):1323-1327. PubMed ID: 38000515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial Stability of Cemented vs Cementless Tibial Components Under Cyclic Load.
Crook PD; Owen JR; Hess SR; Al-Humadi SM; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2556-2562. PubMed ID: 28433426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How metal augments, polyethylene thickness and stem length affect tibial baseplate load transfer in revision total knee arthroplasty.
LaMonica J; Pham N; Milligan K; Tommasini SM; Schwarzkopf R; Parisi R; Wiznia DH
Knee; 2023 Jan; 40():283-291. PubMed ID: 36529046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparable Stability of Cemented vs Press-Fit Placed Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Mild to Moderate Bone Loss: 6.5-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial With Radiostereometric Analysis.
Kosse NM; van Hellemondt GG; Wymenga AB; Heesterbeek PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 27554783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 30-mm cemented stem extension provides adequate fixation of the tibial component in revision knee arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 24554459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Fixation and Subsidence Profiles of Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Implants.
Yildirim G; Gopalakrishnan A; Davignon RA; Parker JW; Chawla H; Pearle AD
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2019-24. PubMed ID: 27004680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micromotion and Migration of Cementless Tibial Trays Under Functional Loading Conditions.
Han S; Patel RV; Ismaily SK; Jones HL; Gold JE; Noble PC
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):349-355. PubMed ID: 32741712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixation techniques and stem dimensions in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a finite element study.
El-Zayat BF; Heyse TJ; Fanciullacci N; Labey L; Fuchs-Winkelmann S; Innocenti B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Dec; 136(12):1741-1752. PubMed ID: 27704204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Biomechanical In Vitro Study of Different Modular Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Stems With Bone Defects.
Guttowski D; Polster V; Huber G; Morlock MM; Püschel K; Nüchtern J
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Nov; 35(11):3318-3325. PubMed ID: 32654944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Knee revision arthroplasty : cementless, metaphyseal fixation with sleeves].
Graichen H; Strauch M; Scior W; Morgan-Jones R
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Feb; 27(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 25620192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micromotion in cemented rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: cemented tibial stem versus hybrid fixation.
Luring C; Perlick L; Trepte C; Linhardt O; Perlick C; Plitz W; Grifka J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 16333631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No difference in long-term micromotion between fully cemented and hybrid fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Mills K; Wymenga AB; van Hellemondt GG; Heesterbeek PJC
Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):875-883. PubMed ID: 35775183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty.
Stern SH; Wills RD; Gilbert JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):44-52. PubMed ID: 9418620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of porous custom-made cones for meta-diaphyseal bone defects reconstruction in knee revision surgery: a clinical and biomechanical analysis.
Burastero G; Pianigiani S; Zanvettor C; Cavagnaro L; Chiarlone F; Innocenti B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Dec; 140(12):2041-2055. PubMed ID: 33170352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
