These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3279829)

  • 61. Treatment refusal among forensic inpatients.
    Young JT; Bloom JD; Faulkner LR; Rogers JL; Pati PK
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 3427230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A.E. & R.R.: Utah's compromise on the right to refuse treatment.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Mar; 32(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 7203412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
    Ledwith DM
    Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Treatment of the mentally ill: legal advocacy enters the second generation.
    Rubenstein LS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Oct; 143(10):1264-9. PubMed ID: 3766789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
    Blais NR
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The United States Supreme Court and mental health law. A retrospective.
    Perlin ML
    Med Law; 1985; 4(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4038535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Right to refuse treatment: impact of Rivers v. Katz.
    Ciccone JR; Tokoli JF; Clements CD; Gift TE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 2372578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. More on the right to refuse treatment: Brother Fox and the mentally ill in New York.
    Rockford SH
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Feb; 11(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 6550699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Patients' right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cole R
    Law Med Health Care; 1981 Sep; 9(4):19-22, 38. PubMed ID: 6116835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Involuntary patients' right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit.
    Binder RL; McNiel DE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 1686192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Some empirical findings on the right to refuse treatment.
    Carter JH
    N C Med J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):108, 113. PubMed ID: 6573573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The right to refuse treatment and the movement for mental health reform.
    Brown P
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1984; 9(2):291-313. PubMed ID: 6491231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The right to refuse treatment: an uncertain future.
    Leong GB; Silva JA
    Psychiatr Q; 1988; 59(4):284-92. PubMed ID: 3241848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. When treatment becomes coercion: a legal perspective.
    Einhorn AH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():199-208. PubMed ID: 6930899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.
    Levy A; Davidson S
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
    Dresser RS
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.