These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32798781)

  • 21. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploring causes and effects of automated vehicle disengagement using statistical modeling and classification tree based on field test data.
    Wang S; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():44-54. PubMed ID: 31103878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coming back into the loop: Drivers' perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving.
    Louw T; Markkula G; Boer E; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():9-18. PubMed ID: 28837837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.
    Beckers N; Siebert LC; Bruijnes M; Jonker C; Abbink D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16193. PubMed ID: 36171437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of working memory in supporting drivers' situation awareness for surrounding traffic.
    Johannsdottir KR; Herdman CM
    Hum Factors; 2010 Dec; 52(6):663-73. PubMed ID: 21284368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigating the impact of static roadside advertising on drivers' situation awareness.
    Young KL; Stephens AN; Logan DB; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():136-145. PubMed ID: 28166872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Attention Assessment for Informing Older Drivers' Crash Risks in Various Hazardous Situations.
    Choi H; Kasko J; Feng J
    Gerontologist; 2019 Jan; 59(1):112-123. PubMed ID: 30007354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of brand and brand trust on initial trust in fully automated driving system.
    Cui Z; Tu N; Itoh M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0284654. PubMed ID: 37141217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A contribution to situation awareness analysis: understanding how mismatched expectations affect road safety.
    Mundutéguy C; Ragot-Court I
    Hum Factors; 2011 Dec; 53(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 22235530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
    Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Take-Over Intention during Conditionally Automated Driving in China: Current Situation and Influencing Factors.
    Feng Z; Li J; Xu X; Guo A; Huang C; Jiang X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigating the self-reported behavior of drivers and their attitudes to traffic violations.
    Vardaki S; Yannis G
    J Safety Res; 2013 Sep; 46():1-11. PubMed ID: 23932680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Driver models for the definition of safety requirements of automated vehicles in international regulations. Application to motorway driving conditions.
    Mattas K; Albano G; Donà R; Galassi MC; Suarez-Bertoa R; Vass S; Ciuffo B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106743. PubMed ID: 35700684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.