392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32799791)
1. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.
Paik H; Park HP
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):201. PubMed ID: 32799791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation Using an Optiscope Versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study.
Nam K; Lee Y; Park HP; Chung J; Yoon HK; Kim TK
Anesth Analg; 2019 Dec; 129(6):1666-1672. PubMed ID: 31743188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway-assisted Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation Is Associated With Reduced Cervical Spine Motion When Compared With C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy-guided Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Cross Over Trial.
Swain A; Bhagat H; Gupta V; Salunke P; Panda NB; Sahu S
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2020 Jul; 32(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 30893284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of Shikani Optical Stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope.
Turkstra TP; Pelz DM; Shaikh AA; Craen RA
Can J Anaesth; 2007 Jun; 54(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 17541072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.
Seo KH; Kim KM; John H; Jun JH; Han M; Kim S
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32408862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Randomized Crossover Study Comparing Cervical Spine Motion During Intubation Between Two Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: Laryngoscope-Assisted Versus Conventional Lightwand Intubation.
Kim TK; Son JD; Seo H; Lee YS; Bae J; Park HP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Aug; 125(2):485-490. PubMed ID: 28244946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial.
Yi IK; Kwak HJ; Lee KC; Lee JH; Min SK; Kim JY
Eur J Med Res; 2020 Aug; 25(1):35. PubMed ID: 32819444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of C-MAC videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization.
Gupta N; Rath GP; Prabhakar H
J Anesth; 2013 Oct; 27(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 23475442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study.
Maruyama K; Yamada T; Kawakami R; Hara K
Br J Anaesth; 2008 Oct; 101(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 18660500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study.
Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 24998112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization.
McElwain J; Laffey JG
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 21586444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with King Vision™ video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study.
El-Tahan MR; El Kenany S; Khidr AM; Al Ghamdi AA; Tawfik AM; Al Mulhim AS
Minerva Anestesiol; 2017 Nov; 83(11):1152-1160. PubMed ID: 28607336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
Anaesthesia; 2008 Jun; 63(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 18477276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical Spine Movement in a Cadaveric Model of Severe Spinal Instability: A Study Comparing Tracheal Intubation with 4 Different Laryngoscopes.
Romito JW; Riccio CA; Bagley CA; Minhajuddin A; Barden CB; Michael MM; Bhoja R; Mootz BL; Skrivanek GD; Klein KW; McDonagh DL
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2020 Jan; 32(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30907779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Bullard, GlideScope, Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes using a cadaver model to simulate the difficult airway.
Zamora JE; Nolan RL; Sharan S; Day AG
J Clin Anesth; 2011 Feb; 23(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21296244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Turkstra TP; Pelz DM; Jones PM
Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19512871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.
Turkstra TP; Craen RA; Pelz DM; Gelb AW
Anesth Analg; 2005 Sep; 101(3):910-915. PubMed ID: 16116013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury.
Watts AD; Gelb AW; Bach DB; Pelz DM
Anesthesiology; 1997 Dec; 87(6):1335-42. PubMed ID: 9416718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic comparison of cervical spine motion using LMA Fastrach, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Inan G; Bedirli N; Ozkose Satirlar Z
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Dec; 49(6):1681-1686. PubMed ID: 31655513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
