These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32799791)

  • 21. Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation.
    Gerling MC; Davis DP; Hamilton RS; Morris GF; Vilke GM; Garfin SR; Hayden SR
    Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Oct; 36(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 11020675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Suppan L; Tramèr MR; Niquille M; Grosgurin O; Marti C
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Jan; 116(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 26133898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of McGRATH®MAC videolaryngoscope blade 1 for tracheal intubation in small children: a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Masui K; Asai T; Saito T; Okuda Y
    J Anesth; 2023 Aug; 37(4):582-588. PubMed ID: 37311898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins.
    McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG
    Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study.
    Enomoto Y; Asai T; Arai T; Kamishima K; Okuda Y
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Apr; 100(4):544-8. PubMed ID: 18238836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.
    Hindman BJ; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; From RP; Todd MM
    Anesthesiology; 2014 Aug; 121(2):260-71. PubMed ID: 24739996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways.
    Kılıçaslan A; Topal A; Erol A; Uzun ST
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2014 Aug; 42(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 27366418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
    Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial.
    Huang P; Zhou R; Lu Z; Hang Y; Wang S; Huang Z
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32434470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Maruyama K; Yamada T; Kawakami R; Kamata T; Yokochi M; Hara K
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 100(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18070787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial.
    Smereka J; Ladny JR; Naylor A; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146. PubMed ID: 28341185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. McGrath Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Ruetzler K; Rivas E; Cohen B; Mosteller L; Martin A; Keebler A; Maheshwari K; Steckner K; Wang M; Praveen C; Khanna S; Makarova N; Sessler DI; Turan A
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):586-593. PubMed ID: 32175948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing the first-attempt tracheal intubation success of the hyperangulated McGrath® X-blade vs the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilization: a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Tan LZ; Toh H; Foo CW; Wijeratne S; Hu H; Seet E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Aug; 36(4):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 34347225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope in normal airways: A randomised trial.
    Thion LA; Belze O; Fischler M; Le Guen M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2018 Aug; 35(8):631-633. PubMed ID: 29975224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Hirabayashi Y; Fujita A; Seo N; Sugimoto H
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Oct; 62(10):1050-5. PubMed ID: 17845658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization.
    Laosuwan P; Earsakul A; Numkarunarunrote N; Khamjaisai J; Charuluxananan S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jan; 98 Suppl 1():S63-9. PubMed ID: 25764615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yoon HK; Lee HC; Oh H; Jun K; Park HP
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 31366325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes.
    Malik MA; Subramaniam R; Churasia S; Maharaj CH; Harte BH; Laffey JG
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 May; 102(5):654-61. PubMed ID: 19336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD™ and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways.
    Mutlak H; Rolle U; Rosskopf W; Schalk R; Zacharowski K; Meininger D; Byhahn C
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2014 Jan; 69(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 24473556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath(®) Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation.
    Foulds LT; McGuire BE; Shippey BJ
    Anaesthesia; 2016 Apr; 71(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26849094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.