These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32800422)

  • 1. Quality of online information for the general public on COVID-19.
    Jayasinghe R; Ranasinghe S; Jayarajah U; Seneviratne S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Aug; 103(12):2594-7. PubMed ID: 32800422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of the patient-oriented web-based information on esophageal cancer.
    Jayasinghe R; Ranasinghe S; Jayarajah U; Seneviratne S
    J Cancer Educ; 2022 Jun; 37(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 32803566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of patient-oriented information over internet on testicular cancer.
    Prasanth AS; Jayarajah U; Mohanappirian R; Seneviratne SA
    BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):491. PubMed ID: 29716564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of English Websites on Dental Caries by Using Consumer Evaluation Tools.
    Blizniuk A; Furukawa S; Ueno M; Kawaguchi Y
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2016; 14(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 26973989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information.
    McMorrow SM; Millett DT
    J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 27485895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines.
    Raj S; Sharma VL; Singh AJ; Goel S
    Adv Prev Med; 2016; 2016():4815285. PubMed ID: 27119025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of information available over internet on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Jayaweera JM; De Zoysa MI
    J Minim Access Surg; 2016; 12(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 27609327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary angioplasty and the internet: what can patients searching online expect to find?
    Kirthi V; Modi BN
    J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 22672356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the Most Visible German Websites on Melanoma Immunotherapy: A Web-Based Analysis.
    Brütting J; Steeb T; Reinhardt L; Berking C; Meier F
    JMIR Cancer; 2018 Dec; 4(2):e10676. PubMed ID: 30545808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments.
    Alshehri A; Alghofaili N; ALshunaiber R; Alkadi L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):62–67. PubMed ID: 33651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Available web-based dental implants information for patients. How good is it?
    Leira-Feijoo Y; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Blanco-Carrión J; Seoane J; Varela-Centelles P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1276-80. PubMed ID: 25041413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
    Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain death and the internet: evaluating the readability and quality of online health information.
    Guven Kose S; Kose HC; Erbakan M; Tulgar S
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2022 Sep; 88(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 35199972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Quality of Rhinoplasty Health Information on the Internet.
    Haymes AT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 76(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 26761153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.