These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32801924)

  • 21. The Influence of Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) and Glass Ionomer (GI) Base Materials on the Microhardness of Various Composite and GI Restorative Materials.
    Itskovich R; Lewinstein I; Zilberman U
    Open Dent J; 2014; 8():13-9. PubMed ID: 24624238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cavity sealers, liners, and bases: current philosophies and indications for use.
    Hilton TJ
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):134-46. PubMed ID: 8957903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity.
    Murray PE; About I; Lumley PJ; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12074229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair.
    About I; Murray PE; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 11239585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Just N; Haller B; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Jun; 2(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15490780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporary dental restorative materials for military field use.
    Hondrum SO
    Mil Med; 1998 Jun; 163(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 9640033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparative analysis of materials for dentino-pulp protection: varnishes, liners, ZOE cements, zinc oxyphosphate cements, zinc polycarboxylate cements, calcium hydroxide cements].
    Riccitiello F; Manieri G; Prisco R; Carratu P
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990; 31(2):197-216. PubMed ID: 2097939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Histopathologic evaluation of the effects of four calcium hydroxide liners on monkey pulps.
    Heys DR; Heys RJ; Cox CF; Avery JK
    J Oral Pathol; 1976 May; 5(3):129-48. PubMed ID: 818349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The glass ionomer cements as bases or linings].
    Kakaboura A; Argyri G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Dec; 44(6):377-86. PubMed ID: 2130348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal.
    Duque C; Negrini Tde C; Sacono NT; Spolidorio DM; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 19548010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage evaluation in amalgam restorations used with bases.
    Wieczkowski G; Yu XY; Joynt RB; Davis EL
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 1389340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changing restorative traditions: the use of bases and liners.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 Jan; 125(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 8294665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.