These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32803400)

  • 1. Evaluating Urology Residency Applications: What Matters Most and What Comes Next?
    Huang MM; Clifton MM
    Curr Urol Rep; 2020 Aug; 21(10):37. PubMed ID: 32803400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. USMLE Step 1 Scoring Changes and the Urology Residency Application Process: Program Directors' Perspectives.
    Chisholm LP; Drolet BC
    Urology; 2020 Nov; 145():79-82. PubMed ID: 32882303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
    Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.
    Movassaghi M; Lemack GE; Badalato GM; Broderick G; Greene K; Ibeziako O; Mirza M; Murphy A; Thavaseelan S; Wolter C; Takacs E
    J Surg Educ; 2023 Jun; 80(6):900-906. PubMed ID: 36914481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of United States Medical Licensing Examination Score Cutoffs on Recruitment of Underrepresented Applicants in the Urology Match.
    Kaldany A; Patel HV; Gore A; Ahmed H; Ghodoussipour S; Park JH; Leitner DV; Jang TL
    Urology; 2024 May; 187():25-30. PubMed ID: 38342381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants.
    Filippou P; Mahajan S; Deal A; Wallen EM; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS; Smith AB
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():56-61. PubMed ID: 31491451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating Urology Program Directors' Perception on Resident Application Parameters Following the Transition of USMLE Step 1 to Pass/Fail.
    Rajendran S; Patel OU; Haynes W; Yadav I; Burge K; Van Wagoner N; Baumgarten A
    Urology; 2024 Jul; 189():144-148. PubMed ID: 38492756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender Differences in the Urology Residency Match-Does It Make a Difference?
    Aisen CM; Sui W; Pak JS; Pagano M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
    Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():39-43. PubMed ID: 28943372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. General Surgery Residency Application Evaluation in a USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail World: A Retrospective Comparison.
    Lauer C; Buonpane C; Lane S; Foreman Z; Shabahang M
    J Surg Res; 2021 Sep; 265():317-322. PubMed ID: 33971463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspectives on Application and Interview Capping in Residency Selection of Surgical Subspecialties.
    Mudalegundi S; Clifton M; Lifchez S; LaPorte D; Ramanathan S; Sabit AH; Woreta F
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Aug; 81(8):1013-1023. PubMed ID: 38755046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resume fraud: unverifiable publications of urology training program applicants.
    Nosnik IP; Friedmann P; Nagler HM; Dinlenc CZ
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1520-3. PubMed ID: 20171693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing Standardized Letters of Recommendation in Urology Residency Applications.
    Nabavizadeh B; Hakam N; Sadighian MJ; Holler JT; Amend GM; Hampson LA; Penson DF; Breyer BN
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():18-25. PubMed ID: 34547345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication misrepresentation among urology residency applicants.
    Hsi RS; Hotaling JM; Moore TN; Joyner BD
    World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 22729465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finding the Next Resident Physicians in the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: An Applicant Survey on the 2020 Virtual Urology Residency Match.
    Spencer E; Ambinder D; Christiano C; Phillips J; Choudhury M; Matthews G; Fullerton S; Dyer L; Zelkovic P; Eshghi M; Wong NC
    Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():44-50. PubMed ID: 34284010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
    Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
    Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
    Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Financial Burden of Applying to Urology Residency in 2020.
    Tabakin AL; Srivastava A; Polotti CF; Gupta NK
    Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():62-67. PubMed ID: 33476604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urology Residency Applicant Selection: Program Directors' New Criteria.
    Rodriguez-Alvarez JS; Munoz-Lopez C; Harwood S; Miranda AF; Campbell SC; DeWitt-Foy ME; Khouri RK
    Urology; 2024 May; 187():33-37. PubMed ID: 38467286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Urology Applicant: An Analysis of Contemporary Urology Residency Candidates.
    Lebastchi AH; Khouri RK; McLaren ID; Faerber GJ; Kraft KH; Hafez KS; Dauw CA; Bird VG; Stringer TF; Singla AK; Sorensen MD; Wessells H; Ambani SN
    Urology; 2018 May; 115():51-58. PubMed ID: 29408686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overemphasis of Step 1 Scores May Affect Application Pool Diversity in Radiation Oncology.
    Fernandez C; Lopez BL; Kushner M; Leiby BE; Den RB
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(1):e3-e7. PubMed ID: 31369886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.