These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32803400)

  • 21. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
    Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
    Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.
    Nikonow TN; Lyon TD; Jackman SV; Averch TD
    J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 25912495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Impact of Holistic Review of Urology Residency Applications on Selection for Interview During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Schulz AE; Nussbaum JE; Loloi J; Sankin A; Abraham N
    Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():34-40. PubMed ID: 36513217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resident Selection in the Wake of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Transition to Pass/Fail Scoring.
    Cohn MR; Bigach SD; Bernstein DN; Arguello AM; Patt JC; Ponce BA; Beal MD; Kogan M; Dyer GSM;
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Nov; 28(21):865-873. PubMed ID: 32925383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of Plastic Surgery Residency Applications without United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scores.
    Irwin TJ; Friedrich JB; Nguyen VT; Ko JH; Phillips BT; Eberlin KR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):219-223. PubMed ID: 34076626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Current Applicant Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Residency Match.
    Venincasa MJ; Cai LZ; Gedde SJ; Uhler T; Sridhar J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 138(5):460-466. PubMed ID: 32163107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The urology match as a prisoner's dilemma: a game theory perspective.
    Weissbart SJ; Hall SJ; Fultz BR; Stock JA
    Urology; 2013 Oct; 82(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 23947988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.
    Poon SC; Nellans K; Gorroochurn P; Chahine NO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 480(8):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 33229901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
    Go PH; Klaassen Z; Chamberlain RS
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 22515757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reversing the Decline in Urology Residency Applications: An Analysis of Medical School Factors Critical to Maintaining Student Interest.
    Wong D; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul I; Khouri RK; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2020 Feb; 136():51-57. PubMed ID: 31785279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of residency match information disseminated by a third-party website.
    Kutikov A; Morgan TM; Resnick MJ
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 19896626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perspectives of Residency Applicants and Program Directors on the Role of Social Media in the 2021 Urology Residency Match.
    Heard JR; Wyant WA; Loeb S; Marcovich R; Dubin JM
    Urology; 2022 Jun; 164():68-73. PubMed ID: 34606880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors influencing the number of applications submitted per applicant to orthopedic residency programs.
    Finkler ES; Fogel HA; Kroin E; Kliethermes S; Wu K; Nystrom LM; Schiff AP
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():31865. PubMed ID: 27448634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection of Neurological Surgery Applicants and the Value of Standardized Letters of Evaluation: A Survey of United States Program Directors.
    Field NC; Gullick MM; German JW
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Apr; 136():e342-e346. PubMed ID: 31926362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Tool for Residency Applicant Screening and Review.
    Burk-Rafel J; Reinstein I; Feng J; Kim MB; Miller LH; Cocks PM; Marin M; Aphinyanaphongs Y
    Acad Med; 2021 Nov; 96(11S):S54-S61. PubMed ID: 34348383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling the Urology Residency Application and Match Process: A Mathematical Argument for Application and Interview Caps.
    Farooq S; Mehta A
    Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():48-54. PubMed ID: 36572222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gender-based differences in letters of recommendation written for ophthalmology residency applicants.
    Lin F; Oh SK; Gordon LK; Pineles SL; Rosenberg JB; Tsui I
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 19(1):476. PubMed ID: 31888607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Red Flags, Geography, Exam Scores, and Other Factors Used by Program Directors in Determining Which Applicants Are Offered an Interview for Anesthesiology Residency.
    Vinagre R; Tanaka P; Park YS; Macario A
    Cureus; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e11550. PubMed ID: 33365219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.