These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3280433)

  • 1. [Vacuum or forceps?].
    Samueloff A; Mor-Yosef S; Weinstein D
    Harefuah; 1988 Jan; 114(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 3280433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vacuum extraction.
    Epperly TD; Breitinger ER
    Am Fam Physician; 1988 Sep; 38(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 3414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Obstetrical vacuum-extractor and forceps. Indications and effects on the newborn infants].
    Bonfadini Bossi E; Rella R; Fagnani D; Salini P; Console V; Onofri MP; Pezzoli G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Apr; 32(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 7383439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative analysis of forceps delivery and vacuum extraction based on our data].
    Woytoń J; Geneja M; Riess A; Szacki J; Runge T; Myśkow M; Gabryś M; Bielanow T
    Ginekol Pol; 1985 Mar; 56(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 4054671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative study of delivery by vacuum extraction or forceps].
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1987 Sep; 22(5):267-8, 310. PubMed ID: 3443017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric vacuum extraction.
    Thiery M
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1985; 14():73-111. PubMed ID: 3885100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Perinatal aspects in forceps and vacuum extraction].
    Altmann P; Goergiades E; Reinold E; Wagenbichler P
    Arch Gynakol; 1975 Nov; 219(1-4):492-4. PubMed ID: 1243444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation].
    Gitsch E; Reinold E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist].
    Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vacuum extraction deliveries.
    Newman C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):670-1. PubMed ID: 7070743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Operative obstetrics--section, vacuum, forceps. Clinical results in 3,742 cases 1966 to 1980].
    Hohlweg-Majert P; Rüdenauer R; Seifert R; Stoll P
    Fortschr Med; 1985 May; 103(17):450-2. PubMed ID: 3997028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Chan et all retrospective study of vacuum versus forceps is really a study of difference of practice and not a study of different instruments.
    Rae PB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Nov; 40(4):479. PubMed ID: 11194449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forceps and vacuum extraction.
    Chamberlain G
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Dec; 7(3):511-27. PubMed ID: 7011647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.