These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32804846)

  • 1. Artificial intelligence can increase the detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li J; Lu J; Yan J; Tan Y; Liu D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Aug; 33(8):1041-1048. PubMed ID: 32804846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Huang D; Shen J; Hong J; Zhang Y; Dai S; Du N; Zhang M; Guo D
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Mar; 37(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 34762157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial Intelligence-Aided Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Zhang Y; Zhang X; Wu Q; Gu C; Wang Z
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 33524298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Adiwinata R; Tandarto K; Arifputra J; Waleleng BJ; Gosal F; Rotty L; Winarta J; Waleleng A; Simadibrata P; Simadibrata M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Nov; 24(11):3655-3663. PubMed ID: 38019222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Barua I; Vinsard DG; Jodal HC; Løberg M; Kalager M; Holme Ø; Misawa M; Bretthauer M; Mori Y
    Endoscopy; 2021 Mar; 53(3):277-284. PubMed ID: 32557490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nazarian S; Glover B; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Teare J
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e27370. PubMed ID: 34259645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
    Deliwala SS; Hamid K; Barbarawi M; Lakshman H; Zayed Y; Kandel P; Malladi S; Singh A; Bachuwa G; Gurvits GE; Chawla S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Nov; 36(11):2291-2303. PubMed ID: 33934173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies.
    Rondonotti E; Zolk O; Amato A; Paggi S; Baccarin A; Spinzi G; Radaelli F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1103-12.e2. PubMed ID: 25053528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of deep convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Aziz M; Fatima R; Dong C; Lee-Smith W; Nawras A
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1676-1683. PubMed ID: 32267558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hassan C; Spadaccini M; Iannone A; Maselli R; Jovani M; Chandrasekar VT; Antonelli G; Yu H; Areia M; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Bhandari P; Sharma P; Rex DK; Rösch T; Wallace M; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Jan; 93(1):77-85.e6. PubMed ID: 32598963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of computer-aided colonoscopy on adenoma miss rates and polyp detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shah S; Park N; Chehade NEH; Chahine A; Monachese M; Tiritilli A; Moosvi Z; Ortizo R; Samarasena J
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 38(2):162-176. PubMed ID: 36350048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endocuff With or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Detection of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial.
    Lui TK; Lam CP; To EW; Ko MK; Tsui VWM; Liu KS; Hui CK; Cheung MK; Mak LL; Hui RW; Wong SY; Seto WK; Leung WK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jul; 119(7):1318-1325. PubMed ID: 38305278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year review of real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy performance.
    Chin SE; Wan FT; Ladlad J; Chue KM; ; Teo EK; Lin CL; Foo FJ; Koh FH
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6402-6407. PubMed ID: 36932187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Xu H; Tang RSY; Lam TYT; Zhao G; Lau JYW; Liu Y; Wu Q; Rong L; Xu W; Li X; Wong SH; Cai S; Wang J; Liu G; Ma T; Liang X; Mak JWY; Xu H; Yuan P; Cao T; Li F; Ye Z; Shutian Z; Sung JJY
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Feb; 21(2):337-346.e3. PubMed ID: 35863686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial Intelligence-Aided Colonoscopy Does Not Increase Adenoma Detection Rate in Routine Clinical Practice.
    Levy I; Bruckmayer L; Klang E; Ben-Horin S; Kopylov U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Nov; 117(11):1871-1873. PubMed ID: 36001408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore.
    Koh FH; Ladlad J; ; Teo EK; Lin CL; Foo FJ
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 35882667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
    Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study.
    Wang P; Berzin TM; Glissen Brown JR; Bharadwaj S; Becq A; Xiao X; Liu P; Li L; Song Y; Zhang D; Li Y; Xu G; Tu M; Liu X
    Gut; 2019 Oct; 68(10):1813-1819. PubMed ID: 30814121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of the endoscopic device Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™ on quality standards in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Walls M; Houwen BBSL; Rice S; Seager A; Dekker E; Sharp L; Rees CJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2023 Apr; 25(4):573-585. PubMed ID: 36471638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.